Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato (footballer, born 1992)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 15:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Renato (footballer, born 1992) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Played three games in 2012, hasn't played since RossEvans19 (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Brazil. RossEvans19 (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- "Withdrawn by nominator" Per sources found by Svartner, I am happy to withdraw this nomination. RossEvans19 (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep – He abandoned his football career and became the futsal player known as "Tatinho" (Corinthians, Sporting CP, Brazil national team) [1]. There are articles on GloboEsporte and UOL about this change. Svartner (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- In this case, it would even be appropriate to move the article to Tatinho or Tatinho (futsal player), since his career in the sport has become more notable than in football. Svartner (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 20:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe notable on the Brazilian wikipedia, but I am not so sure for the English one. I just don't see it. At the moment, I feel this is a delete. Govvy (talk) 10:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment – More complementary sources [2], [3], [4]. Svartner (talk) 12:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.