The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. No support for deletion beyond nominator. (non-admin closure) Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Porzellanikon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

German musem that fails WP:GNG. All sources that I can find about it are just ads. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Germany. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP: A general search on the web shows that the museum meets the threshold for Notability. Poor citation sources removed and new and better ones put in their place. Myotus (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Myotus. Mccapra (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Porzellanikon's designation as a state museum in Bavaria gives it clear cultural standing and recognition. Combined with coverage in Sueddeutsche Zeitung, a prominent national newspaper (WP:RS), this meets the notability criteria under WP:NORG. HerBauhaus (talk) 12:51, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: per HerBauhaus. Gmcbjames (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, a clear judgement per the above comments. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.