The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Poarch Band of Creek Indians. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OWA (entertainment district) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search of sources fails to find WP:SIGCOV beyond re-hashes of the same press releases about future expansion. IMO, fails WP:GNG, could be merged to Poarch Band of Creek Indians if need be but don't see the benefit since the information is largely unsourced and has not attracted coverage. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks and Alabama. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Promotional article and the district as a whole lacks in-depth coverage (notability of the theme park and water park are separate questions). MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:47, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, what target would you see for a possible redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still looking for a redirect target or were you considering Poarch Band of Creek Indians as well, MrsSnoozyTurtle?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Oops, thanks for the reminder ping, Liz. Yes I think Poarch Band of Creek Indians is the most suitable target (it isn't a great redirect, but seems to be the best of what's available). Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The OWA district was previously known as Park at OWA, and there is some significant coverage under this name. The Sun Herald published multiple news articles about the area in here, here, here, and these other articles, and al.com also covered it here, here, and in all of these other articles. The Pensacola News Journal also covered the opening of the Park at OWA here. I'm not going to !vote "keep" because the sourcing is pretty bad, and I do not have the time to improve it myself, but it's also clear that the article should not be deleted. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.