Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kun faya kuun
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 08:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Kun faya kuun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article appears to be about a movie (see Kun fayakuun at IMDb), but it has been automatically translated from Indonesian. From what I can understand of it, it is not written in an encyclopedic style, but rather appears to be a personal narrative of the author's experience watching the movie. Even if the movie does meet the notability guidelines for movies, which I don't have enough information to be certain of, it's unclear that we would want to keep any of the current text in its current form. I recommend a delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete--speedily. Metropolitan's arguments are sound, and very diplomatically phrased (I couldn't do it like that). Drmies (talk) 03:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom, this looks like a review of the movie, not a description of it. Zetawoof(ζ) 04:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete looks like someone was translating an Indonesian film review into English. --Yowuza ZX Wolfie 15:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete curent article but allow return if/when written encyclopedically and sourced, as there appears to be coverage. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - the article is a personal movie review -- Whpq (talk) 21:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I was about to prod it for lack of a translator when I saw that it had been listed here for what it is: a personal review. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 00:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.