The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ari Louis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This individual does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. He has not received significant coverage in reliable sources and sources independent of the subject. Most of the references either do not mention individual, mention individual in passing only, or are links to blogs, social media posts, or subject's YouTube page. Firecat93 (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The consensus in the original AfD discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Louis) was to delete the page. Firecat93 (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @The Blade of the Northern Lights Shouldn't this page have been deleted following the result of the first AfD? Firecat93 (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I deleted it in 2012, so it was. This was recreated in 2014, at this point it's different enough that G4 no longer applies. If it's deleted again, some salt may be in order. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Judaism, Sports, Israel, and Arizona. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Not enough references. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 21:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and do not salt per nom. Fails GNG due to lack of independent, significant coverage. If there is consensus to delete from this AFD, two deletions spaced out by over 12 years is not anywhere close to grounds for protection against recreation. Frank Anchor 14:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not properly sourced as meeting inclusion criteria. The sources don't represent WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him, and instead comprise a mixture of primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things, which are not support for notability. Not sold on the need for salt here yet — if it gets recreated again anytime soon without being significantly improved, then we can certainly consider salt, but I don't think being recreated ten years ago by an editor who's never touched Wikipedia again under that username (so probably UPE or sockpuppetry, but far, far too stale to even try checking for that anymore) warrants jumping to that right off the bat. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep

CarlSerafino (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Inadequate citations and fails to meet WP:GNG criteria. Go4thProsper (talk) 23:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.