The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan Premier League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Vestrian24Bio 05:32, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and Afghanistan. Vestrian24Bio 05:32, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, not convinced by nominator. Geschichte (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  What? Vestrian24Bio 09:09, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  You say "fails this and that" like it's obvious to everyone how it fails the guidelines. Since it's not apparant, you did not provide an argument whereby users could be convinced. Geschichte (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It fails SIGCOV, because it doesn't have SIGCOV, do a web search and see for yourself... Vestrian24Bio 04:06, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:20, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, given that the article demonstrates significant coverage through both news sources (like the Times of India) and professional international bodies (like the ICC). It seems reasonable for a national competition in one of the most important sports within the Commonwealth, to be covered here on Wikipedia. Klbrain (talk) 14:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The sources in the article are enough to demonstrate significant coverage about a top-tier franchise league. The nominator had nominated a lot of articles for deletion within a short time, I doubt whether WP:BEFORE was done. Robo^Cric Let's chat 09:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think the sources are enough for notability. It has significant media coverage . Sources are reliable. Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.