Hello, BabyJat!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BabyJat. Thank you for your work on Aisha Nantongo. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Grace Nanyonga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BabyJat,
I noticed, you are a new editor for Wikipedia, so I want to give you some hopefully useful tips. For articles like Asha Noppeney wikidata often does hold lot of facts, can be used for the artikle. Please check Asha Noppeney (Q131414564). reasonator shows the same in a bit more pretty way.
It is also worth to check other language versions (shown on the bottom of wikidata entery): Asha Noppeney in simple English.
Maybe all that helps, that you can add bit more to your Article, for instance as Asha is a writer, you can add the book title she wrote or you give a bit more precise informations about the location, she lifes at (Eckersdorf in the district of Bayreuth). Regards and happy editing, --J. Lunau (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that per WP:USERNOCAT, pages in your personal sandbox, such as User:BabyJat/sandbox/Kakonge Robinah, are not allowed to be filed in categories as if they were finished articles in mainspace — categories have to stay off the page so long as it's still in your sandbox, and can be added to the page only if and when it's been moved into mainspace as a real, finished article.

I've had to remove the page from categories three times in just three days, so please don't readd it to categories again so long as it's still in sandbox. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BabyJat! Thanks for your contributions to WikiGap 2025 Uganda. Earlier, I was going through articles with potential typos, and found your new page on Sostine Namanya.

I wanted to send a heads-up to your talk page, as in addition to fixing some typos adding a short description, I also did a fair amount of work with removing redundant hyperlinks, fixing redirects, tightening the infobox, streamlining body sections, and other minor updates to capitalization and spacing. As the article's creator, I encourage you to review the updated article as we continue to improve it. :) – Normal Name (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Aidah Bukubuza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BabyJat,

Thank you for creating Betty Mwesigwa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article, but it's not clear that Mwesigwa meet any of the notability criteria. An effective infectious disease researchers, but research output doesn't meet the usual criteria for inclusion (Scopus shows an H-factor of 5, for example).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Nanyonga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 06:33, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BabyJat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 06:33, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Christine Nalubowa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 06:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Sostine Namanya, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 04:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Shirley Gladys Nakyejwe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 11:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Tina Wamala. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and WP:NOTCV. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 17:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 01:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Olila High School WFC has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Fiktube) in violation of ban or block

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Asubo Ladies FC has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Fiktube) in violation of ban or block

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Article reinstated. Risker (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Sarah Babirye has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Fiktube) in violation of ban or block

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Article reinstated. Risker (talk) 15:45, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BabyJat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Administrator, I’m writing to request the unblocking of User:BabyJat, who appears to have been mistakenly blocked due to sharing an IP address at times with User:Fiktube. User:Fiktube was blocked for unrelated reasons. However, User:BabyJat is a separate individual, and the IP overlap is incidental due to occasional shared network used. Please review the block and consider restoring access to User:BabyJat, as I am not involved in any of the issues associated with the block on Fiktube. Let me know if further clarification is needed. Thank you for your time. Sincerely BabyJat (talk) 11:08, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

As noted below, I have personally confirmed that these are two separate users, having met both of them in person in the past 24 hours. This has been discussed with the blocking administrator, who as noted is okay with removing the block. Risker (talk) 15:40, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to put this in public since I was notified of this offwiki, this is the relevant check. The data points might be on the other side of the privacy waterfall by now. I was informed offwiki that there might indeed be two people here, so verification for that would be good, and if it comes, any admin has my blessing to remove the block as I am too busy to back-and-forth the rest of this week. cc Martin Urbanec Izno (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Izno, Thank you the support so far. If necessary we can arrange a meet up with both parties involved.

MichealKal (talk) 09:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Babirye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Babirye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:26, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bashir Mansur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:43, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lazaro Bwambale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazaro Bwambale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Govvy (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]