Talk:USS Kearsarge (BB-5)
| USS Kearsarge (BB-5) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turrets in Superpositions
This ship has turrets in superpositions which was very high tech for it's time, it didn't arrive on Royal Navy battleships untill well after dreadnought. This is where a turret is placed behind and above another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.247.12.181 (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- The design is better thought of as a two-story turret as the upper part couldn't rotate independently. Super-firing turrets were entirely independent and far more useful in combat.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Why is this vessel a "BB"?
The designation "BB" only came into existence in 1920. When commissioned she would have have been "Battleship #5; in 1909 "B-5" would have started to come into use. She was converted to a crane ship in 1920 and redesignated IX-16 (briefly) and then AB-1. "BB" came into use on July 17 1920, the same day she was recommissioned as a crane ship so she never went under the "BB" designation and was never listed as BB-5. Any source that says otherwise would be anachronistic and wrong. Herostratus (talk) 09:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Good question —Opecuted (talk) 15:37, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Namesake
I don't think the name of the sloop is given in the cited source;
The Kearsage [sic] was unique among American battleships in not being named after a state. Instead, she memorialized a Civil War steam sloop, just lost, which had defeated the Confederate raider Alabama in a famous battle in 1864
— [1]
I'll mark the passage as failed verification for now. —Opecuted (talk) 15:31, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- And it's not mentioned there that the name came from an act of congress either. —Opecuted (talk) 15:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Text from article for ref
She was soon named after the American Civil War sloop-of-war Kearsarge, and was the first ship of the United States Navy to be named by act of Congress. She was the only US battleship not named after a state.[1]
- 08:10, December 14, 2025
- —Opecuted (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
References
References
- ^ a b Friedman 1985, p. 30.
- Friedman, Norman (1985). U.S. Battleships, An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-715-1.
Use of the verb "sail" - Invitation to debate: Standardization of maritime movement terminology
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |
|
I have initiated a formal proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships regarding the standardization of maritime movement verbs (specifically addressing the technical inaccuracy of using "sailing" for vessels that are only power-driven). As this discussion touches upon:
The input of editors from this project is highly valued to ensure a cross-disciplinary consensus. Join the discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Use of the verb "sail": Proposal to Align Vessel Movement Terminology with IMO/COLREGs Standards TheUltimateGenealogy (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2026 (UTC) | |






