This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It has been suggested that The Wall Street Journal Asia and The Wall Street Journal Europe be merged into The Wall Street Journal. I agree per WP:CFORK and WP:DICDEF, as they are essentially duplicates. These are three on essentially the same subject, with the same scope. Describing the working, format, circulation and readership. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 14:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on the grounds that The Wall Street Journal is already large enough, at 86k, and the Asia and European editions had a large circulation in their respective areas over several decades (suggesting that independently notability is likely). Klbrain (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The WSJ (Europe)'s launch coincided with the Financial Times' disappearance from our newsstands, due to a journalists' strike, but when, six weeks later, the FT reemerged, they apparently had not lost a single subscriber, let alone reader, neither in the UK nor on the Continent. Which should tell you enough. If there's anyone old enough to have been around at the time and willing to do 'the archaeology', I'd greatly appreciate that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:69A2:FA01:9B7:6A41:6736:536 (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]