Talk:Eurasianism

Wrong info in the map

"(Soviet territories that were never part of the Russian Empire: Tuvan ASSR, Kaliningrad Oblast and Zakarpattia, Lviv, Stanislav and Ternopil regions in west Ukraine) "- actually, the Russian Empire spanned as far as Poland(including it), and all parts of Ukraine were once parts of the Russian Empire, as was Tuva. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.76.121.160 (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge Eurasia Movement to Eurasianism on the grounds of short text and context. Klbrain (talk) 08:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support the proposal to merge Eurasia Movement to the relevant section here; that page is very short, which doesn't warrant being split from the broader topic. Klbrain (talk) 13:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree They differ. One is an ideology and the other is a political movement. Instead let's reduce the focus on Dugin. Herreshoffian (talk) 02:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The argument is that discussion of the movement benefits from the context of the ideology, and that readers are best served by having related but distinct topics discussed in one place for ease of navigation. Klbrain (talk) 08:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
support merge. Joyous! | Talk 13:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Jjpachano (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  checkY Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Gumilyov

A mention of Lev Gumilyov and his work Ethnogenesis and the Biosphere, and Putin's belief in it, would improve the article. CracksInTheFloor (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References not supporting a statement in the introduction

At the end of the introduction one can read: « Eurasianism has been officially endorsed in Russia's 2023 Foreign Policy Concept approved by Vladimir Putin, which defined Russia as a "Eurasian and Euro-Pacific" civilizational-state closely aligned with China, the Muslim world, and other countries of the Global South, seeking to replace Western hegemony by a "Greater Eurasian Partnership".[1][2][3] »

However the references do not support such a statement: there is no use of "closely aligned", and indeed only one occurrence of the word "align" in "non-aligned", no expression meaning "closely aligned with China", no mention of "muslim world", no mention of "global south", no mention of replacing western hegemony by a "Greater Eurasian Partnership", in the official russian document, nor, for most items, in the two opinion articles commenting it. Also, out of rigor, the term "civilizational-state" is not used, but "country-civilization" is. In conclusion i think the references do not support the statement quoted above, and that the quoted statement is misleading; thus i think it should be amended or deleted. Plm203 (talk) 13:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Russia adopts new anti-West foreign policy strategy". Deutsche Welle. 31 March 2023. Archived from the original on 15 April 2023.
  2. ^ Gould-Davies, Nigel (6 April 2023). "Russia's new foreign-policy concept: the impact of war". IISS. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023.
  3. ^ "The Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation". Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union. 1 March 2023. Archived from the original on 10 April 2023.
allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eurasianism