Talk:Buford Highway

Questionable source

While I fully support an article for Buford Highway, I have to question the website The Buford Highway Project as a reliable source. It provides no references, is still under development, and the author's only credentials are that he is local so it appears very much like a blog.--RDavi404 (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Buford Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Buford Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Buford Highway → Buford Highway, Chamblee, Georgia – Articles about U.S. neighborhoods are usually named X, Municipality, State. Also, make Buford Highway a redirect to Georgia State Route 13. 2600:1700:6180:6290:EC64:EA7C:FD5F:B5B8 (talk) 23:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jlwoodwa: WP:USPLACE says are typically titled "Placename, State" not that this is required. Titles should be concise and follow usage in reliable sources per the policy Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:CONCISE and WP:COMMONNAME specifically) and the current title is not contradicted by the WP:USPLACE guideline, which describes a typical place like Chamblee, Georgia and is not a requirement for all populated places. For example Little Five Points and Brooklyn (which had a similar RM at Talk:Brooklyn/Archive 2#Requested move 28 September 2016) do not follow this convention because like this article they are not the typical populated place for which this would apply. - Aoidh (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New paragraph

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I am contributing to this article as part of a Digital Humanities project. I plan to add a paragraph to the page that expands on Buford's Highway's multicultural significance, focusing on immigrant communities, diversity, and the growth of international businesses along the corridor. This addition is supported by a reliable source from the Atlanta Regional Commission's "Buford Highway Corridor Study" (2019).

I believe this edit will strengthen the article by providing updated, well-cited information on the demographics and cultural aspect of the highway. Please let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions.

Thanks all. Kevinn803 (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Buford_Highway