Talk:1992 Flores earthquake and tsunami

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1992 Flores earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1992 Flores earthquake and tsunami/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Wildfireupdateman (talk · contribs) 16:27, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 10:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Will review this article this week. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 10:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my comments:

Lead

  • In Mercalli, link the scale.
  • "a submarine landslide is suspected." what do you mean by this?
  • More in the lead about the tsunami.
  • For source 1, make the archived link the main.

Earthquake

  • I suggest putting "tectonic setting" in a separate section before the earthquake description.
  • I suggest that you change the time to match the source.
  • Source 5 needs author and website (probably).
  • Add website to source 2.
  • There seems to be something wrong with the dash in the number of aftershocks; it needs to be changed.
  • "140 km by 40 km" you can still use the convert template on this.
  • The website of source 9 doesn't need to be capitalized.
  • Add the date of Source 12.
  • Please fix the abbreviation of the convert template.
  • Link all instances of ResearchGate in the sources.
  • Add the website of source 16.
  • References 8 and 17 are duplicated.

Tsunami

  • Link the first appearance of Maumere.
  • Link the only appearance of Riangkroko.
  • "Along other tsunami-hit locations" this needs fixing.
  • Link Babi Island.
  • "making nearly a quarter of the island's population" maybe change making to representing.
  • There's something wrong with the link in source 8.
  • Add website of source 19.
  • References 16 and 19 are duplicated.

Aftermath and relief efforts

  • I suggest you spell nineteen as a number.
  • I suggest you reword "demolished" to "destroyed".
  • Something is wrong with source 24. Please convert it and remove the sentence.

This is all I have to add. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 23:44, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wildfireupdateman: pinging. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 23:45, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • Fixed
  • Elaborated a little bit; let me know if you prefer something different/more.
  • Added runups to lead
  • Fixed

Earthquake

  • Fixed
  • Fixed
  • Not sure what to fill out for name (I'm hesitant on putting UN DHA); fixed ref (hopefully)
  • Done, also added publisher
  • Switched to en dash if that's what you meant
  • Done, also changed "by" to x
  • Done
  • Fixed
  • Fixed (hopefully)
  • Fixed
  • Done
  • Fixed

Tsunami

  • Done
  • Done, but redlink
  • Reworded and a bit more specific.
  • Done (Listed in lead for runup now)
  • Done
  • Not sure what you're talking about; but if it's accessibility issues with the paper, the full version is on sci-hub for free.
  • Done
  • Fixed, I think. No page number now though :(

Will add more comments as I fix more stuff

WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 00:41, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Some unfinished/wrong things:
  • In Earthquake section: source 14 has url-status error; remove that parameter.
  • I forgot to tell you this, but you need to use a date template for the sources (put it on the top of the article). You use the DMY format so you need to add (USE DMY dates).
  • You fixed source 24, but the capitalization is still wrong.
Here are all the things you missed (or I forgot, or you were confused). @Wildfireupdateman: pinging. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 10:07, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed all I think. Sorry for being kind of a pain, this is my first GAN. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 15:18, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're not a pain, this always happens. Everything looks good, passing. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:44, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath and relief efforts

  • Fixed
  • Fixed
  • Fixed, I think?
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1992_Flores_earthquake_and_tsunami