The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:07, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Elisabeth Kubler-Ross (five stages of grief) - → Five stages of grief  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure if Elisabeth Kubler-Ross (five stages of grief) needs to exist, but the nominated redirect is unlikely/WP:COSTLY due to the hyphen at the end. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unlikely search, plenty other ways to get there via Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, Five stages of grief, On Death and Dying, etc. Tule-hog (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note this redirect has been around since 2005. Rusalkii (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  ...Actually, 2004, but yeah. And surprisingly, this title has always been a redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this current redirect as the hyphen at the end makes it implausible. I would probably still object to Elisabeth Kubler-Ross (five stages of grief) being made though, as a potential WP:XY between the article on the psychiatrist herself or the model named after her User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Implausible as it may seem, this is an OLD redirect, and should be kept for that reason alone, purely to prevent link rot if nothing else. For its stupid implausible formatting, hyphen included, it gets a surprising number of yearly hits... 33 this year alone! That hints to me that external incoming links are a thing somewhere, and we should continue to catch those. To the contrary of nom's opinion, I believe WP:CHEAP applies here. Fieari (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Irrelevant ancient cruft. I'm not convinced by "this is old". * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As Tule-hog says, there are plenty of other good alternatives. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:18, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Fried shrimp#Ebi tempura. Jay 💬 22:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Tempura shrimp → Tempura#Serving and presentation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I think this would be a commonly searched term. Justjourney (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Justjourney: You've just created it. Why would you like it discussed at RfD? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see if others agree with it being created? Justjourney (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Probably best to "delete per WP:REDLINK and WP:XY" due to possible confusion with Fried shrimp. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Fried shrimp#Ebi tempura per Hyphenation Expert's comment. It's not enough for me to fully support their targeting option since all Shrimp are Prawn but not all prawn are shrimp, meaning the proposed target may not necessarily be about the subject of the redirect, but it's better than the current target which only has a vague mention of "shrimp" at Tempura#Seafood; having the redirect target there would seem to be a WP:RETURNTORED situation due to the lack of content specifically about the subject of this redirect. Either way, the current target is not specifically about shrimp but rather "presentation" about tempura in general, and there's more content about a shrimp topics at Fried shrimp regarding tempura, so at the very least do not keep. Steel1943 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Fried shrimp#Ebi tempura. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 20:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Fried shrimp#Ebi tempura, as being more directly about tempura shrimp. Fieari (talk) 00:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Vlad the Impaler. ✗plicit 14:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Дракуля → Dracula (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Seemingly unhelpful to redirect the cyrillic to the Dracula disambiguation page. To my understanding none of the entries have the cyrillic anywhere. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Romanian Cyrillic alphabet, and the historical Dracula was from Wallachia, part of historical greater Romania, which also used Cyrillic. Wallachia is now part of Moldova, which also uses Moldovan Cyrillic alphabet -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Contingently, Retarget to Vlad the Impaler - According to Romanian Cyrillic alphabet, Romania used a cyrillic alphabet until 1830, Vlad the Impaler was in the 15th century. That would make this WP:RFOR compliant... assuming that this cyrillic is correct to the historical Romanian alphabet, and that this term was used for Vlad in Romanian at some point before 1830. I would guess that this is the case, but I don't know for certain, so my !vote is contingent on these being true. Fieari (talk) 23:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try. Notified of this discussion at the suggested target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Fieari. There's plenty of links to other pages if that's not what the reader wanted. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Vlad the Impaler per Fieari. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:43, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cephalobaenida → Cephalobaena  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not monotypic, contains other genera such as Raillietiella and Yelirella. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 09:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – according to WoRMS, Railletiella and Yelirella comprise the family Raillietiellidae in the monotypic order Raillietiellida, leaving Cephalobaenida monotypic. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but according to the paper describing Rileyella/Yelirella it’s a cephalobaenid. Raillietielids are also referred to as cephalobaenids in this paper alongside several others. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 15:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try. Also notified the BLARer of this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The source references quoted above are from 2003 and 1984 - not recent. The ToL accepts WoRMS as a standard reference and we should continue to follow it as the newer (and regularly updated) source. The redirect follows MOS and the taxobox in the genus article. Until that changes, we should not tinker with the redirect. Loopy30 (talk) 17:18, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate at Tamago and retarget the second redirect there. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Tamago → Tamagoyaki  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Tamago (food) → Tamagoyaki  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"Tamago" means "egg" in Japanese, whereas "yaki" means "grilled". The current target effectively redirects "egg" to "grilled egg", and is hence too specific compared to other Japanese egg dishes, particularly Onsen tamago. feminist🩸 (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Egg. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:RLOTE: Common words or concepts
  Disambiguate Found second topic Tamago (Mr. Stain on Junk Alley), dab has been drafted. Paradoctor (talk) 04:25, 10 February 2025 (UTC); edited 13:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Masami Akita discography where the 2004 album "Tamago" is listed. It cannot be redirected to Egg, since that is not a Japanese topic and there is no AFFINITY. It cannot target the current target, since it's the wrong name. The current target and other uses of Japanese food are PTM and not useful as not referred to as such on its own. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 07:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  In theory, Category:Japanese egg dishes can be a plausible target. feminist🩸 (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Apart from the WP:XNR issue, "egg" shouldn't redirect to "egg dish" for the same reason it should not redirect to "grilled egg".

  More importantly, you missed me changing my !vote to "disambiguate". Redirecting to wherever is no longer appropriate. Paradoctor (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Tamago (food) also exists and points to the same target. It should be bundled into this nomination -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 07:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate for all the various WP:DABMENTIONs, given the absence of any good mainspace target for Japanese egg dishes (which would otherwise be WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT). 59.149.117.119 (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Added Tamago (food) to the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support dab for Tamago. Tamago (food) can retarget there as well. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate. Enix150 (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DAB - While egg has no affinity for Japanese per WP:RFOR, there are plenty of English uses of Tamago as can be seen in the draft. Adding Tamagoyaki and Onsen Tamago to the dab might be acceptable as well. Fieari (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ashley Guillard → 2022 University of Idaho killings  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Ashley Guillard falsely accused Rebecca Scofield of being involved in the crime which is the target of this redirect, and Scofield won a defamation suit over that accusation. The mention of Guillard had been removed from the target article as WP:UNDUE weight. Rebecca Scofield was deleted today at its RfD, this should be too. Jay 💬 09:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Keep per WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  How is this cheap, or which of the 5 points of that essay would you like to highlight? Jay 💬 15:15, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Point 1. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No mention = not cheap. Steel1943 (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Confusing without a substantive mention. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete (unless a discussion of the case is ever re-added to wikipedia) - Anyone searching this name is looking for information on the false accusation, and they won't find it because it was removed from the article, presumably for BLP compliance. Unhelpful, as the existence of this redirect without an explanation in the article could be actively misleading! It might lead a searcher to assume that the accusation was true, for example! (Note, regulars to RfD will know I often support redirects without a mention because they CAN be helpful... this one can't) Fieari (talk) 00:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. At best this is unhelpful; at worst there are BLP concerns. Contra Jax, WP:CHEAP#1 is irrelevant: while it is true that deleting redirects does not save disk space, that does not mean that we should retain redirects which are unhelpful or harmful. We routinely delete redirects for all sorts of reasons despite the existence of CHEAP. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Concise Grove Dictionary of Music → The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This particular version of the work is not mentioned at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, why not add it there then, 1234qwer1234qwer4, and then it will be? The correct title is actually The Grove Concise Dictionary of Music, but this is close enough to be a viable redirect. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no such work called the "consise grove dictionary of music". Whenever someone feels like adding this material to the article, they can create a redirect for "The Grove Consise Dictionary of Music" as soon as there is content to substantiate reader's search term. At this time there is not, so no need to mislead readers with a promise of content we cannot deliver at this time. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 10:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete consistent with Grove Concise Dictionary of Music. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• DK King of Swing DS → Donkey Kong: Jungle Climber  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Recreation of former RFD material - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_March_21#DK_King_of_Swing_DS User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 07:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Identical issue to previous RFD, so instead tagged with {{db-g4}}. Tule-hog (talk) 07:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Although this redirect was deleted in 2019, it was kept in January 2020. As such, I think bringing this redirect back to RFD makes sense if there is an issue. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, for some reason did not see the older nomination that is clearly in the history. Tule-hog (talk) 07:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this redirect implies that King of Swing received a DS port more than it implies that it got a DS sequel. I also can't imagine it getting much digital footfall, honestly. Jack talk 17:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Urban Development Action Grants → United States Department of Housing and Urban Development  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Topic is not mentioned at the target. Tule-hog (talk) 06:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. IP's comment is irrelevant since the other term wasn't even brought up in the discussion. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Deputization → Deputy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Topic not mentioned at target (a disambiguation page), nor at Deputy sheriff (a likely retarget). Tule-hog (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per wikt:en:deputization seems the current target is good, as several items on the dab page can be referred to. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The several mentions of this in enwiki indicate a variety of different meanings. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do not confuse this as "de-Putin-ization". 67.209.129.142 (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:04, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Industrial socialism → Socialism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Topic is not discussed at the target. Tule-hog (talk) 05:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Kurwa bobr → Eurasian beaver  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Seems like a pretty WP:BFDI-ish redirect like "Despacito 2" and other barely notable memes that i've seen being made into redirects on Wikipedia. 67.209.129.191 (talk) 04:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note WP:BFDI is an essay on a specific article that keeps on being continually recreated over and over again, and not (as nom used it) a general catch all essay for any given topic or redirect. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 07:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but by the way, "WP:BFDI" has evolved into Wikipedian slang for something that's popular yet not notable (which would be irrelevant otherwise). For proof on this, here's a quote from WP:BFDI itself (most related parts highlighted in bold):

In fact, several users have used the term "WP:BFDI" to broadly refer to any subject in general whose popularity, or even existence, does not translate to notability.

67.209.130.82 (talk) 01:18, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah right, forgot about that :P User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Wikipedia doesn't need a redirect for every passing meme if they're not discussed at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Les Ateliers Métallurgiques de Nivelles → fr:Ateliers métallurgiques  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target. Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful, and no other redirects to foreign language targets exist. Additionally, the plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (WP:SOFTSP). See here for precedents. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 02:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Mentioned in a few local articles, but La Brugeoise et Nivelles seems to be the best potential target if this is to remain extant. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 02:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is effectively a cross-namespace redirect, and it's confusing because leads unexpectedly to a page in another Wikipedia. It's one use at La Brugeoise et Nivelles should be replaced with a correct inter-language link. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

This redirect has been speedy deleted via G4 per the results of the previous RFD. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• PlayStation(R)4 → PlayStation 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Recreation of previous RFD material - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_14#PlayStation(R)4 User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 02:17, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).