Vierka Berkyová (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance for this Z-list celeb. References are profiles and interviews. Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep^Talk 20:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Television, and Slovakia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Both SME and Život references look decent, the former of which has more independent analysis beyond the interview. Searching for "Vierka Berkyová site:.sk" on Google may show more secondary results. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:13, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Život has no byline, it is a PR announcement of the new album which never appeared and the SME stated is from the editorial office, meaning its paid for PR as well. Those two are non-rs sources. You don't know how to evaluate references. scope_creep^Talk 16:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making hostile personal comments. Thank you. (I am not sure I agree with your appraisal of the sources (Korzár being what it is, not great but certainly not plainly "non-rs"; and the same goes for Život and Plus jeden deň (same group) in general and in that particular case) but even if it is correct, that's not my point). -Mushy Yank. 19:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to SuperStar_Search_Slovakia#Series overview: (or to SuperStar_Search_Slovakia season_3. Listed there, obviously (as the winner), as I suggested when I deProded the page and added sources (same nominator) if the sources are judged insufficient for a standalone article. -Mushy Yank. 18:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC) Changing to Keep in view of the sources presented by @Newklear007:. Thanks. [edited, -Mushy Yank. 16:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)][reply]

Your the editor that removed the prod and put these trash references in. You have no clue how to evaluate a proper reference either. I intend to check every article you have created in the next several weeks. scope_creep^Talk 20:01, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. But, again, do refrain from making (very) hostile (and rude) personal comments. -Mushy Yank. 20:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic but you can sign your comments with ~~~~ All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 13:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have been an editor for 6 years now so I am a bit shocked that you didn't know this (that's an assumption though). Please remember to sign your comments properly. All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 14:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @All Tomorrows No Yesterdays:, not sure what you meant: who did you assume didn't sign their comments properly? Every single comment on this page was. Including mine. -Mushy Yank. 16:28, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: – I would be fine for redirect. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Clariniie: Actually, I am now a Keep myself too given the new sources presented. Thanks!-Mushy Yank. 16:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is sufficient converge in secondary sources. Personal attacks are not an argument for page deletion. Newklear007 (talk) 12:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newklear007: What secondary sources, exactly? If there is no secondary sources that satisfies the WP:BLP and WP:BIO, then in a month or two it will going to Afd. So post up the secondary sources. I see you have only done 15 Afd's. It is common best practice, consensus based practice to post the evidence on here, so they can be reviewed, i.e. WP:SECONDARY sources that satisfy WP:BIO. Then I can close it. scope_creep^Talk 14:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep Here you go [1][2][3][4][5] Newklear007 (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Newklear007: Thanks for posting that. It looks like there is some more stuff there that wasn't there before. I'll take a look, shortly. scope_creep^Talk 15:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment These references arent particularly decent either. What is here is a singer who took part in the Slovensko hľadá SuperStar, at the end was dropped by her label and never made an album. Most of the coverage is instrumental to that event and there is nothing else. She fails WP:NSINGER and WP:SIGCOV. It all z-list stuff and completely non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 19:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that uncivilized behaviour, personal attacks and singling out a specific editor to follow around are all serious policy violations.

If you disagree with someone's source assessment, criticize the assessment, not the editor who presented it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:07, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hoping for some more views about the sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]