Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Siege of Baghdad (1821), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Wikipedia history articles shouldn't be illustrated with AI-generated images of buildings that never existed. Belbury (talk) 18:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Belbury,

Thank you for your feedback. I may have made a mistake regarding the inclusion of original research. However, my intention was to ensure that the information I added was based on reliable sources. I plan to update the information by adding the appropriate sources. I will make the necessary corrections as soon as possible.

Regarding your warning about AI-generated images of non-existent buildings, I will take that into consideration as well. I will be more careful and ensure that I use appropriate visuals moving forward.

Thank you for your assistance and understanding.

Best regards,

BEFOR01 BEFOR01 (talk) 18:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ottoman–Persian War (1821–1823). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made to Siege of Baghdad (1821) seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Belbury, thank you for your feedback. I did not use AI while making the edit, I wrote it based on my own research and sources. I will review the accuracy and relevance of what I wrote and present the information more clearly with proper sourcing. If there's anything else you can assist with, please let me know. Thanks! BEFOR01 (talk) 19:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BEFOR01. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@BEFOR01 hi Thank you so much for your time! Have a great rest of your day! Phoebezz22 (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]