Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

An early 2009 GA that's worse for the wear. Issues include multiple inappropriately large galleries, relatively poor quality sources, somewhat confusing prose, a couple uncited points, but most importantly intense breadth issues (no mention of geology for an article on a mountain range? a one sentence climate section?) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 09:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No tags for this post.