|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Sanba draft
Hi A1Cafel. Just saw your draft on Tropical Storm Sanba and it's very good and well written. Keep up the great work! Shmego (talk) 18:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I'm afraid that this is the only draft that I can write recently, since there is no archives (or I cannot find it) in other TC articles. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nice job with Chaba and Shanshan as well! If you ever want some help finding information for future articles, I'd love to contribute. Shmego (talk) 02:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Sanba (2023) has been accepted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21a9/d21a9fe329c6392c4e3b71729f8f08f1ed80de61" alt=""
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 07:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclone Belal has been accepted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21a9/d21a9fe329c6392c4e3b71729f8f08f1ed80de61" alt=""
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Utopes (talk / cont) 20:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Draft:Tropical Storm Wukong (2012)
The previous draft was deleted as abandoned per WP:CSD#G13. It had significantly more information, formatting etc. than your new version. Do you want me to just restore the old draft for your to work on instead?-- Ponyobons mots 22:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Ponyo: Yes, please. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Nice job on this, I published it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
2024 Noto earthquake
The cost of damage for it is debated so the old number counts. I recommend bringing it back or listing it using the average cost between the lowest and highest numbers Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Talking about list of disasters by cost if you were confused by what am I talking about. Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand what is old (damage) number of the 2024 Noto earthquake. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The highest estimation for that is 17.6 billion US dollars as stated by Wikipedia. Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 08:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Any reliable source that support the claim? --A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know why is it listed on that article when I can't find sources for the higher estimates. Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- I saw it here, but ASAIK damages with a range generally used the lower limit, because we can't say the total damage can be up to the higher limit. Using the lower limit with ">" seems to be the best way. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I will add the ">" symbol to the disaster, thank you for the info. By the way thanks that you are taking care of that list because I kinda burned myself out. Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- I saw it here, but ASAIK damages with a range generally used the lower limit, because we can't say the total damage can be up to the higher limit. Using the lower limit with ">" seems to be the best way. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know why is it listed on that article when I can't find sources for the higher estimates. Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Any reliable source that support the claim? --A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The highest estimation for that is 17.6 billion US dollars as stated by Wikipedia. Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 08:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't understand what is old (damage) number of the 2024 Noto earthquake. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Wukong (2012) has been accepted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21a9/d21a9fe329c6392c4e3b71729f8f08f1ed80de61" alt=""
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
RangersRus (talk) 10:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Shanshan (2013) has been accepted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21a9/d21a9fe329c6392c4e3b71729f8f08f1ed80de61" alt=""
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
RangersRus (talk) 01:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Talas (2022) has been accepted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21a9/d21a9fe329c6392c4e3b71729f8f08f1ed80de61" alt=""
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Sonamu (2013) has been accepted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21a9/d21a9fe329c6392c4e3b71729f8f08f1ed80de61" alt=""
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)