You may know me from WP:RBV22 and WP:S++. I realize that I've been monkeying around meta stuff a bit too much, but I'll try to do content stuff in my giant checklist below.
Testimonials
I know you love fights but I have don’t. — User:Fishytimes196 21:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
OMG, you actually tried to redefine it!!! [1] (I just reverted that nonsense). The level of disruption here is out of control. — User:Born2cycle 06:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Why the hell are you even commenting on our politics you commie? Go focus on your own dictatorial government you pos. — User:24.172.154.107 19:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I am an endorser of The SamuelRiv CamelCase shortcuts normalization idea. Therefore, I pipe shortcuts like WP:AGF into WP:AssumeGoodFaith to give newbies a guess at their meaning and minimize shouting while still showing that the link is a shortcut.
Nosist
A person who refers to themself using the first-person plural, a.k.a. using the we/our pronouns. Employed by some pluralists. I did this for a while before I was banned from a Discord server I love and sometimes still do it. I am not a pluralist.
Ip, Ippy, Ippo
A way to humanize IP editors. The latter two are employed when there are multiple IP editors.
nomm'd
A telltale sign that one is a Wifione sockpuppet, despite the entire word being orthographically and grammatically correct. The people who say "nom'd" are the true freaks.
Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.
This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.