Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests


If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
  • To list a technical request: the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

@~2026-33773-6: Can you provide a source for this name change? HurricaneZetaC 16:01, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it has been cited in the article. HurricaneZetaC 03:52, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The English version of the Sweden government website still uses the original name: [3]. That may be a translation or workload issue; if the real Swedish name of the agency has changed in recent government documents, I can't see it due to uncertain online translation. ----DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:12, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's possible it is a little bit confusing what is going on since the changes were implemented just some weeks ago. Therefor it is possible that the new name has not been visible at every single page on the Swedish government pages. However, the agency who previously in Swedish was named 'Ekonomistyrningsverket' (in English: the Swedish National Financial Management Authority) is from January 1 this year now called in Swedish 'Statskontoret' (in English: Swedish Agency for Financial and Public Management). Therefor, I believe that the article should change its name based on that facts. There are several sources on the page who proves that the name change is real. /~2026-40830-5 (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Thomas H. White Sorry, the (radio station) disambiguator was arrived at via a 2019 RM on Talk:KCLA (Arkansas). So a new RM will be needed to change it again. Bensci54 (talk) 17:04, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

@KingSkyLord The title is create protected so will need an admin HurricaneZetaC 16:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
How sure are we that XOGUS99 isn't a sock of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Scottish12345678? * Pppery * it has begun... 18:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery: Even if XOGUS99 isn't, I'm almost certain the article is LLM-generated. My guess is XOGUS99 asked ChatGPT to translate the Korean Wikipedia article for them. Yue🌙 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Behavior suggests that this user is based in Korea (he makes edits to Korean text) but I don't see much resemblance to the pattern described in the LTA report on Scottish12345678. At present a full move discussion is running on the article talk page. I suggest that the technical move request be closed. The article is not bad. EdJohnston (talk) 03:30, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Template:Sv (disambiguation)  Template:Sv (move · ) – I know the latter page is salted because it has been repeatedly recreated; however, I think that making it a template disambiguation page could be better for users. That said, it does appear to have been a redirect to {{Sv icon}} (now deleted) from 2012 (?) to 2020, and then a redirect to {{Sock vote}} from 2022 to 2023, so maybe making it a template disambiguation page would be more surprising for those looking through old page revisions? Duckmather (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]