Hi Spino-Soar-Us! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Arch of Charents. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Annh07, I would like to ask you how many more sources I need to establish notability. I also have to ask you about translations, because this article is based on a place that has been written in German and Western Armenian. I would like to know how I would be able to possibly link them up after my page is ready to be published. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please read Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features), which are the criteria for determining the notability of this article's subject. If you have reliable and in-depth sources, 3-4 sources are enough (WP:THREE). Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified (you may cite German or Armenian sources). The sources you provided in the article are not reliable sources so I have removed them per WP:UGC and WP:ELNO. Annh07 (talk) 09:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Annh07, but you misunderstood me. I wasn't talking about the sources when I said the German and Western Armenian article but the pages like this link

https://hy.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D5%89%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%A5%D5%B6%D6%81%D5%AB_%D5%AF%D5%A1%D5%B4%D5%A1%D6%80_%D5%B0%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B7%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%B1%D5%A1%D5%B6_(%D5%88%D5%B2%D5%BB%D5%A1%D5%A2%D5%A5%D6%80%D5%A4).

I was asking about how I could connect these articles with the different types of languages that are above for the view history and edit source. I also want to mention that use of the YouTube video " Ռաֆայել Իսրայելյան" was used in the Western Armenian version (same link above) of the website and is the only reason why I used it. Unless you again say that it's unreliable, I am going to add it, but thank you for suggesting improvements on my page. But thank you for suggesting improvements on my page and thank you for telling me as much as you have on my talk page. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:INTERWIKI, I hope it will help you.

Also you need to know that Wikipedia projects are independent, some sources may be acceptable for Armenian Wikipedia but may not be acceptable for English Wikipedia. Youtube is not a reliable source, per WP:RSPYT. Annh07 (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Edward-Woodrow were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All claims need to be sourced. Where is the information coming from? Also, some of the language is promotional or emotionally manipulative.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arch of Charents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edawrd-Woodrow. on the 5th of November, you declined the article called Draft:Arch of Charents. One of the reasons you listed was reliable sourcing, and I wondered which one of the sources was unreliable. Also, I am also asking if the sources that I found would be reliable (they are written in Armenian but if you need the translation button is still there for the entire page). The sources are [1], [2] and [3]. Also, I would like to thank you for helping me with this article and for the feedback that you presented I will try to use in correcting the article. Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spino-Soar-Us! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but Trollhunters: Rise of the Titans was produced under DreamWorks Animation Television. Not the main company itself. Could you remove the film from the List of DreamWorks Animation productions and leave it in the DreamWorks Animation Television page please? 107.77.198.83 (talk) 00:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bungle was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lead indicates this is a list of major characters but many do not even have their own character article. Very few links are to specific character articles. No indication the list of characters is notable and no sourcing discussing it. Essentially WP:LISTCRUFT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Dreamworks Animation characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Suitskvarts was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Verification of the Stalin part by the provided source failed: the source doesn't claim anything of the sort.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arch of Charents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Suitskvarts (talk) 08:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you placed Crood Awakening back on the List of unproduced DreamWorks Animation projects article after I had removed it. I provided an explanation since it was repurposed into The Croods. When the film was first announced in 2005, this was the general synopsis:

Set in the Stone Age, "Crood Awakening" is a comedy about a big man in a small village called Crood. His position as Leader of the Hunt is threatened by the arrival of a prehistoric genius who comes up with revolutionary new inventions like fire.

I'm sure you are fully aware that animated films constantly go through various cycles of development, but the general idea of the film stayed the same. I am advocating its removal based on this. PrinceArchelaus (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of extinct languages of Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akkad. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charents Arch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spino-Soar-Us. Thank you for your work on Charents Arch. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some parts still evidently read like an essay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armenia in the Early Bronze Age and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 18:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spino-Soar-Us! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Norwegian Crusade that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. See also WP:CATSPECIFIC before adding duplicate categories. TylerBurden (talk) 18:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TylerBurden! First of all, thank you for explaining what minor edits are for. Although I have been editing articles for two years now, I still am learning stuff and didn't know before you told me what minor articles specifically meant. But, I just want to clarify my point on the category of crusades as I have seen you reverting my edits on it. I saw the reason why you were removing the category was because it article already had a specific category that went to the Norwegian Crusade. This category had a problem where it wasn't connected to the Crusades category itself, so I have made it a subcategory. But I still believe that the Norwegian Crusade article should have the category specifically on Category:Crusades because it is a major crusade and crusades like the Albigensian Crusade and the Nicaean–Latin wars. I won't change it anymore and I would like to know your opinions on why the category shouldn't specifically be on the article. Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 01:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, the reason is WP:CATSPECIFIC. The Norwegian Crusade subcategory itself is part of the Crusades category. If you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Crusades you will see it listed there. TylerBurden (talk) 19:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All great! I just want to say that I added that recently but prior to that when I was editing on the article itself, they weren't connected. But thank you for clearing this up. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 05:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you are still doing this. TylerBurden (talk) 14:21, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okjeo language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahan language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of extinct languages of Oceania, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spino-Soar-Us. Thank you for your work on Gasgu language. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please mention this at the target page with a good reference.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:Hi and thank you for your message. The reason why I did add Gasgu language onto the Kaskian language page is because the Kaskians article has a source and mentions Gasgu as one of the names for the Kaskians. I do not have a specific source for the Kaskian language also being named the Gasgu language, so I am asking you what should I do? Thank You Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page says 'Gasga' (as one of the names of the Kaska people. Should we change the language redirect accordingly? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the language redirect should be changed as the article Kaskians doesn't mention the language as the Kaskian language article exists to talk about the language. I believe that we could assume the Gasgu language is the same as the Kaskian language, which is why I believe the redirect should remain the same. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 06:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Araks, Armavir (east). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spino-Soar-Us

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Temple of Charents, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 13 § Temple of Charents.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824:Hi, I understand your discussion on deleting the page. I do not have sources for it and I do believe that it should be deleted with the Arch of Charents' and Charent's Arch as they also fall under the same category. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I understood you: Why should those redirects be deleted? They seems like acceptable variants of the article Charents Arch to me. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: The redirects should be deleted as they have not been used and they are incorrect as the apostrophes make it so that the name changes to be incorrect. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They seem ok to me. But feel free to start an RFD if you wish. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if you can please add it into the discussion of Temple of Charents thanks. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I don't think the criteria for deletion matches with that RFD. Additionally, Like I indicated above, I would oppose the deletion of these redirects, as they seem fine to me. There is a step-by-step procedure to start an RFD on the page that I've to above, which you can follow if you'd like. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just so you know, there have been discussions in the past, and it's generally not considered best to include the Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger status in the infobox in that manner. There are a few reasons—mainly, it's semantically incorrect, as that parameter is meant for maps and is being misused for something else. Secondly, it's a bit of an overreach to fully equate language vitality with the clear visual analog being drawn—i.e. with biodiversity on species articles and the like. It is much preferrable in my mind to mention a language's status in the body, but it is inappropriate semantically and POV-wise to give such visually specific placement in the infobox. Cheers. Remsense ‥ 论 01:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Golyad language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk) 08:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attempt to edit the Visigoths page. However, I reverted your contribution. Please pay closer attention to the content of your additions, as it is clear on the page that Gothic was the language of the Visigoths, who spoke an eastern dialect thereof. Also, if you are not fully aware, you need to cite content to reliable sources (RS). Many generic websites do not qualify. Your best bet is to get content from academic books and/or respected journals. Happy editing. Obenritter (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to let you know that in the article List of extinct languages and dialects of Europe, I moved Ludza, Old Prussian, and Wangerooge Frisian from formerly extinct to currently extinct, because, while they are undergoing revival, they do not have native speakers, thus, unlike Livonian or Manx, which do have native speakers, they are still extinct. It seems there is some ambiguity between whether "extinct" means no native speakers or no secondary speakers, so feel free to revert if you know something I don't about this topic, although the article in question does say the list is for languages with no native speakers. I'm informing you because you were the one to add Ludza to formerly extinct languages. All the best, 90.139.162.184 (talk) 14:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taurap's on another continent; appears to just be a LingList error — kwami (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks. I'm just going to undo the Ethnologue source as it states the same thing and you are able to access it without being forced to go through a paywall. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The point of the old Ethn source is that it gives some idea of the age of the undated pop figure. E15 is from 2005, so the data must be at least that old. It could be much older, of course, but it's the only thing we have to go on. — kwami (talk) 07:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Ok, I'm sorry that I wasted some of your time. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 07:23, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a waste. We need a new generation of people to take care of this info, or to improve on it if they/you think of something better. — kwami (talk) 07:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make it so that the article about the Urarteans can link to other languages about the same article, and also was added to Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention? Marquis2425 (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bremian dialect. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 20:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tried to find any information other than the source that was used before and I could only find the dialect of Hanover being linked to Low German in the German Wiki. Due to this fact, I have removed the information and the source. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 03:37, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

Same as previous reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bremian dialect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at South Ossetian expedition of 1830 instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Ossetian expedition of 1830 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 12:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yazidi genocide (1915), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:05, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bremian dialect, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:27, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch occupation of London, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dajasj (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please make the Urarteans and Zoks articles available in other languages on Wikipedia? Marquis2425 (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am just going to say that I won't be that helpful in trying to translate your articles into other languages. I've only done 2 translations for articles from English to other languages, as I mainly translate from other languages to English. Out of the 2 times I have translated an article, one of them was deleted as it was a translation made using the translate feature and the other one has had limited interactions and could be deleted in the future for the same reason. The best I could do for you is translate your articles into Armenian as I know Armenian and the articles are also related to Armenians. Could you also tell me where you got some of the information for Urarteans as I believe you mentioned that you got it from a Russian page? Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, after I published this comment, I searched for the articles with the Armenian names and found them. I have now properly linked both articles to their translated pages via Wikidata and it will show 5 more languages for Urarteans and 2 more languages for Zoks. Other than the languages already made, I cannot translate any more due to the reason above with there already being a Armenian page for both languages. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Andriivka, Sumy Raion, Donetsk Oblast, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. QEnigma (talk) 08:19, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Deep State reports that Russia captured Kamianske while Ukrainian Armed Forces deny it and ISW doesn't take a clear position. What do you think should we do; XANTHO GENOS 5.5.2024 (talk) 15:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to guess you want to change the Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War. We usually use ISW there as the main source, but I have also used Deepstate as a source too. You could use Claimed Captured like its on the Oleksiivka, Khotin Hromada part in the Sumy Oblast section and leave it as contested.

Oleksiivka

547

Sumy

Contested[1]

7 Jun 2025

Contested by  Russia since 7 June 2025.[1] Claimed captured by  Russia sources as of 10 June 2025.[2]

Thank You! Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! XANTHO GENOS 5.5.2024 (talk) 09:33, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MediaKyle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexandr Binda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MediaKyle (talk) 22:41, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duripsh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma 10:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from uk:Новокостянтинівка (Сумський район) to Novokostyantynivka, Sumy Oblast. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Desulfobotulus sapovorans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anaerobic condition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just letting you know you accidentally deleted a whole section in the 2025 Shanghai Masters page and to be careful next time. QueerMarxist (talk) 11:23, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 2 § Category:Male tennis players born in the 1980s on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down @Spino-Soar-Us these categories are extremely unhelpful for navigation ^SMason_Garrison 22:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ^SMason_Garrison 22:52, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles containing Rongpo-language text has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 22:58, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male tennis players by date of birth has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 22:59, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adamtt9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

does not yet meet WP:NTENNIS or WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timofei Derepasko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adamtt9 (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanzhi language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 17:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitris Sakellaridis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 20:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavlos Tsitsipas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pavlos Tsitsipas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:08, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spino-Soar-Us. Thank you for your work on Novi Vyrky. Another editor, EytanMelech, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article! Int he future, when translating articles from Ukrainian wikipedia, you must give attribution in the edit summary & on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|EytanMelech}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

EytanMelech (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adamtt9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Although technically meets WP:NTENNIS, sources don't indicate notability enough to meet the broader requirements at WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tennyson Whiting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adamtt9 (talk) 12:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kindrashivka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) (contributions) 12:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Spino-Soar-Us, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TylerBurden (talk) 07:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just want to know in what page(s) and what edit(s) that I has caused you to type this notice and message to me. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 08:00, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Portuguese creole of Tugo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 5 § Portuguese creole of Tugo until a consensus is reached. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 12:41, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adamtt9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not yet meet WP:GNG as I am not finding enough WP:SIGCOV. Very likely a case of WP:TOOSOON and may be revisited depending on what happens at the Australian Open coming up.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yannick Theodor Alexandrescou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adamtt9 (talk) 11:36, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kostiantynopil' requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –DMartin (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Kostiantynopil' has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 9 § Kostiantynopil' until a consensus is reached. –DMartin (talk) 21:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adamtt9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yannick Theodor Alexandrescou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adamtt9 (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Adamtt9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kai Thompson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Adamtt9 (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you changed Learner Tien into the incorrect date format. It should be mdy instead of dmy. We conform to the proper format depending on the player's nationality. Most are listed right on the player article when you edit. Just an fyi. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you made more US incorrect date formatting since this post. Please be more careful. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:15, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jagger Leach. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Improper date formatting for American tennis player. You have been told multiple times nicely to use MDY for American tennis players. I can only assume you don't care at this point and any edits made against guidelines will be reverted. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just want to clarify that I did see all of the messages about the date mixeup and I wanted to reply to this, but I forgot. I want to apologise, as I also forgot about the mdy dates format. I know that I will probably make that mistake again, but I just want to clarify that I am committed to using the correct date format for American tennis players. I also noticed that you reverted my edit on the basis of a dispute. I have only edited another time on the article and with something that has no affiliation with the reverted edit, so I just want to know whether you had any other problems with my edit of that the date format being wrong. I also want to know whether I needed to use the mdy format for the updated part of the infobox since it already was using the dmy date format prior to my edits. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 12:21, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have to remember that often people make multiple changes in the same edit. I don't always have time to weed out the good changes from the bad changes. I did it multiple times for your edits and mentioned it in edit summaries. Then I mentioned it two times here on your talk page. After that I looked at it as disruptive and that you didn't care. When you edit you are certainly under no obligation to make right what is already wrong. If you don't fix a date and leave it alone, there are no issues at all. But if you know a US player date is in the wrong format and add new dates you should really correct the date format at that time. And there were several articles recently where you changed from a good format to a bad one. Like using bgcolor in html. It's deprecated but if no one touches the color attribute there's no real issue. It's when you change the color that you should be using the correct formatting. So yes, if you are taking the time to add new dates, it should be in the correct format. I reverted you on the basis of disruptive editing. Someone has to go around and fix the dates you got wrong on US players. It's absolutely great that you update the stats, just please use the right format. Otherwise what happens is if you had done nothing, in a little while someone would have fixed the dates and the formatting. When you just fix the dates editors say I'm not bothering with fixing just the formatting since it not hurting anyone. So it rots.

I want you to continue updating stats... it's a job many dont want to do. Thanks for that. But please if you do update an American player's dates, put them in the correct format. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:59, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kai Thompson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:32, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]