Archives

August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 September 2025 October 2025 November 2025 December 2025 January 2026 February 2026

I just wanted to know if you read @NeoGaze's response about Sam Badi draft and what we can do about it Chandl3r45 (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chandl3r45. I'm going to do a source assessment to see where we are with this.

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.trendhunter.com/trends/hip-clothing	The references include Sam Bandi's own Tumblr, which isn't independent plus source #2, so really this is just churnalism.		~	✘ No
https://en.socialdesignmagazine.com/mag/design/sam-badi-t-shirt-linglese-maccheronico-e-cool/				✔ Yes
https://www.amnotizie.it/2023/07/22/capo-dorlando-da-scarti-e-rifiuti-di-nylon-nascono-splendidi-costumi-cosi-sam-badi-punta-sullecosostenibilita/	Potentially based off a press release / paid promotional piece?			? Unknown
https://www.gqitalia.it/moda/trend/2017/08/01/10-t-shirt-per-lestate	~ Mostly an interview.			~ Partial
https://www.amnotizie.it/2021/07/02/sam-badi-think-grin-e-punta-sullecosostenibilita-i-nuovi-filati-realizzati-con-la-fibra-riciclata-di-econyl/				✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

So - two okay sources, I'd usually be looking for three sources. Do you have any other ones that are particularly strong? qcne (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

maybe this source? Chandl3r45 (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might work. What do you think, @NeoGaze? qcne (talk) 10:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I checked that source and it reads like a paid promotion, so I don't think it would be appropiate to count it as independent nor reliable. NeoGaze (talk) 10:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this and this ? Chandl3r45 (talk) 14:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That second one seems better NeoGaze (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so can I re-edit the draft, removing AMnotizie's sources? Could you point out any parts of the text that should be reorganized to be more neutral? Chandl3r45 (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, the only issue I have with the draft right now is that the following statement "the brand has gained recognition among a youthful demographic by integrating ironic elements into contemporary fashion designs" should be attributed (ie: who or what medium is saying this, since its highly subjective). NeoGaze (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it was specified in this AMnotizie source, I can still rephrase it as "the brand has gained recognition among a wide audience by integrating ironic elements and memes into contemporary fashion designs" Chandl3r45 (talk) 23:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the reject template an attributed the statement myself. When you are finished with the draft, you can notify me for a second look, or wait for another editor to review it if you prefer that. NeoGaze (talk) 08:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i guess it's ok with your fix. What do you thnk? Chandl3r45 (talk) 12:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't really approve as it is now, as I don't think its fullfills the GNG criteria. NeoGaze (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might be worth submitting for review, @Chandl3r45, and seeing what a third reviewer thinks? qcne (talk) 14:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, i proceed! Thanks (and finger crossed) Chandl3r45 (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

fast as light! They tell me it looks like it was written by ChatGPT :D

Which is very unlikely since we worked on it together. What do you recommend me to do? Chandl3r45 (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Left a reply. qcne (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a weird reason to decline it. I sugget waiting until more substantial coverage comes through, or the brand becomes more notable by some event. NeoGaze (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just discovered that Lux-Life magazine awarded Sam Badi "Best Sustainable Streetwear Brand 2025 – Italy LUXlife Sustainability Excellence Award 2025". Source here, does this seem relevant? Chandl3r45 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly NeoGaze (talk) 13:12, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I edited the draft Chandl3r45 (talk) 13:55, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone! Just to be clear, should I wait for a third reviewer to issue a verdict, or can you take a look? Chandl3r45 (talk) 16:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you read what @Vodnir wrote, but I further edited the opening, hoping to make it even more neutral. I'm not entirely clear about the request about citations; I don't understand what exactly I see being done. Chandl3r45 (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the mention. I’ve removed the advert and cleanup tags, and slightly neutralized some of the tone. Please consider adding stronger independent sources to help with notability. Vodnir (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chandl3r45 and @Vodnir - my gut feeling is we're at the threshold of notability. I would probably recuse myself from reviewing as I've done so much work on the draft, but I think a reviewer could probably accept. qcne (talk) 11:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Qcne,

Thank you for the time and effort you dedicate as an experienced reviewer. Your contributions to improving drafts are truly appreciated and make a meaningful impact. Vodnir (talk) 11:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks a lot! I'll check if there are any other references, and if so, I'll add them :) Chandl3r45 (talk) 15:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User thilio has nominated Sam Badi's page for removal from Wikipedia, questioning GNG and ORG. What do you think? Chandl3r45 (talk) 10:44, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Qcne we'd like to wish you a belated Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. :)

User thilio has nominated Sam Badi's page for removal from Wikipedia, questioning GNG and ORG. What do you think? Chandl3r45 (talk) 13:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hia @Chandl3r45. I did comment on the AfD and pinged you in - I would recommend you comment and argue for why it should be kept :) qcne (talk) 13:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Qcne,

I did reply with all the material I found online about the brand, but I'm not sure I did the right thing! Thanks u Chandl3r45 (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Qcne

It's possible that my issues with Sam Badi draft can be resolved by rewriting the draft in line with Wikipedia's WP:NPOV, WP:PEACOCK and WP:PUFFERY and search about the quality resources on an independent platform according to WP:RS, WP:GNG and WP:ORG? Chandl3r45 (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chandl3r45. Yep, that would certainly help! qcne (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne Do you have any suggestions? Should I modify the existing draft, or can you help me build a new draft elsewhere? Chandl3r45 (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at the draft and it seems good enough to be accepted as a stub. @Chandl3r45: Good job! NeoGaze (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks to all! We did it! Hooray! :)

Thanks @NeoGaze and @Qcne so much for your support! Chandl3r45 (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! :) NeoGaze (talk) 18:21, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Qcne! So I've taken quite a while to digest all feedback I've gotten from the Teahouse and other forums. First of all, I wanted to say thank you for your feedback specifically. It felt very scary to see that red banner on my passion project but reading comments like yours made declination better. Thank you for that. 🤎 So I'm currently working on revamping the draft and I would like to humbly request your eyes to make sure I'm on the right path. Specifically, I would like to know: 1) Does the subject (Martina Dimoska) stand a chance on Wikipedia? You mentioned some concern you had about the subject meeting the criteria. Maybe it's because of the quality of the past draft... maybe not? Maybe it's just the subject itself? I don't know, let me know what you think. 2) Am I on the right path with the references? I understand interviews are not reliable, independent sources, but what if I can't find alternatives? 3) As you would see, I took out some sentences I felt I fluffed waaaayyyyy too much and even the published research section (because I had to go knee-deep in archives to get those and if I had to go that far... then maybe it's not public enough to mention so I took it out). Do you think this was a right step to take? I know there's still a lot of work to do. I know I need to read everything line by line and ensure full compliance to the WP MoS but for now... do you think I'm on the right path? I'd really appreciate any feedback you give. Thanks! SpaceTrail (talk) 11:12, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SpaceTrail! I'm answering on behalf of @Qcne, per their request on the NPP Discord! I'm a fellow new page reviewer, and work in the same area of the project as them! I hope my feedback is helpful to you!

• Linking this for quick access: Draft:Martina Dimoska

This is what's classed as a WP:BLP, which means sources are held to a higher standard. At this time, the draft appears to have a substantial number of sources that are considered generally unreliable. These include WP:LINKEDIN, WP:INSTAGRAM and multiple WP:BLOGS. Interviews are considered WP:PRIMARY, and can be used, but do not contribute to notability, in this case WP:NPERSON.

I can't comment on whether this individual is notable without doing a deeper look, but from what I can see, this draft complies with WP:NPOV and MOS:SO! I think with some sourcing improvements, this draft should have a good chance of being accepted through AfC! Happy editing! 11WB (talk) 20:07, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @11WB! First of all, thank you so much for your response. I hope you don't mind, I have a few areas of concerns. So first of all, I had to sleep on the reliable sources list on Wikipedia and even though it was very overwhelming. So I have 38 references on the draft (if you don't count some occasional reuse here and there), only 4 of my sources are on the sources list (thankfully all are green): Forbes, Voice of America, Bloomberg Adria (huge question mark on this one because Bloomberg Adria — a Bloomberg Media + Mtel Swiss project was not listed), and National Geographic (another huge question mark because my citation was from a National Geographic Polska which mentions being under the National Geographic Society, but I'm not sure if that automatically makes NG Polska credible). THEN, the remaining 34 did not even show up on the list. I know the list is not exhaustive (👀?) but it just made my jaw drop a bit. Now, my questions:

1) UNIVERSITY SOURCE: For example, my draft has a citation from UND Today (UND Today is the University of North Dakota’s official online news source... according to their website). I'm not 100% sure but I think this was the only platform that shared this story because it was a university-focused space project. What do you think? Should I just not mention the project itself if a university press is the only thing that can back it up? Or will that fly?

2) WEBSITE PAGES: Okay, so there are instances where I had to cite some static website pages as a proof of statement. For example (not going to external-link too much just in case so I'll just mention), the LunAres Research Station Ambassadors page that shows Martina's profile under the SELENE and TERRA NOVA analogy astronaut missions. Or the ICEE Space homepage that has Martina's profile (as well) to proves she was indeed a part of the APICES mission (alternative options was a Facebook post from ICEE. Lol). Or the spacegeneration.org/regions/europe/northmacedonia page that mentions Martina Dimoska as one of the National Point of Contacts of North Macedonia. How do I proceed with these? I believed that these sources were important to verifying some statements I made. If these are unworthy sources, does that mean I have to take out those statements?

3) MACEDONIAN-BASED SOURCES: So I noticed a lot of Macedonian-domained outlets did say a lot about Martina... and I cited some I felt were credible (?) like Gradska.mk, Anthropol, MKD.mk, presedatel.mk, CRNOBELO.com... what yardstick can I use to measure the reliability of this kind of source? Especially measuring it in a way that a Wikipedia reviewer would (or rather understand the rationale).

I know this is long. I sincerely apologise for the time you'll spend on this. If you feel I'm being too lazy and specific Wikipedia articles exist that addresses all my highlighted concerns exist, I wouldn't mind being pointed to the helpful articles. Anyone works. Thanks. 🥹 SpaceTrail (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is quite a lot to go over there. I think your best bet would be to start a discussion at either the Teahouse or the reliable sources noticeboard. They are more appropriate venues to receive feedback. 11WB (talk) 17:13, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@11WB, I'm sorry. I knew this would be too overwhelming. Pardon the dump and thank you so much for your assistance. I really appreciate you. SpaceTrail (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SpaceTrail. Glad to see the draft has now been accepted :) qcne (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Hope you’re well

I had a Wikipedia question come up from a recent call with one of the organisations we work with, and I wanted to sense check my understanding from a Wiki best practice point of view

Their CEO, Sigrid van Aken, has recently been awarded the Légion d’Honneur. She already has an “Awards and honours” section on her English Wikipedia page, but the only coverage I can currently find is on the organisation’s own site - which made me assume it wouldn’t be appropriate to add anything yet.

I was curious:

- Is the usual expectation that honours such as this should only be added once there’s independent secondary coverage? - And more generally speaking, if something is added to the English page in future, do other language Wikipedias ever update automatically, or is that always handled separately?

I’m mainly asking to make sure I’m thinking about COI and sourcing in the right way.

Thanks so much!! LaurenCanavan-Wiki (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LaurenCanavan-Wiki. Sorry for not replying to this- I have been on a Wikibreak. Did you get this answered in the end, or do you still need help? qcne (talk) 20:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I’m working on a draft of an article about a music album. When it comes to information regarding, say, the overarching theme of the album or how long the recording process took, do those strictly need to be from secondary sources? They’re details discussed on the artist’s website, but I’m unsure if that works in this circumstance, since I’d assume that’s a primary source. :P --Frippenator (talk) 22:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Frippenator, sorry for not replying to this- I have been on a Wikibreak. Did you get this answered in the end, or do you still need help? qcne (talk) 20:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So my page Marvin J. Thacker has some reliable sources such as https://www.news-expressky.com/news/one-of-pike-s-oldest-living-veterans-shares-his-story/article_c830f308-a9b4-11ec-914d-1f3fed266fdf.html. Is it ok, because I stated the “He’s never been hit,” straight out of the text. I also referenced it. Mrmacrobloxteleb (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mrmacrobloxteleb. I am afraid I do not see how this person meets our criteria for inclusion? qcne (talk) 20:23, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m retired anyways. Mrmacrobloxteleb (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, well let me know if you have any other questions. qcne (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

• Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2026 Steward elections started on 06 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC) and will end on 27 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process for current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.

---

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greyhound racing on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 22:30, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:26, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

what can I do better so I can get Athazagoraphobia published and could you help me with it? Ghostrider00 (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi @Ghostrider00, because Wikipedia is not a dictionary, we don't accept articles that are simply definitions of neologisms, as they don't meet our notability criteria. If you're able to find multiple sources that discuss Athazagoraphobia in-depth (meeting WP:GOLDENRULE), then an article might be viable if it's expanded beyond a definition. Cheers, nil ^nz 02:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Help Project is holding a discussion on planning help pages to provide instructions for editors on how to use AI apps to work on Wikipedia pages. We're currently brainstorming the kinds of things AI apps can be used for, and the types of pages these can be applied to, in order to choose what help page to draft first. Drafting a how-to help page, and trying out the tools to test work flows (instructions), may provide much insight into the practicalities to apply and pitfalls to avoid in the use of AI on Wikipedia (all namespaces). The thread is Wikipedia:Help Project#Planning help for AI workflows. See you there!    — The Transhumanist   19:18, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qcne, I recently processed a sockpuppet investigation which concluded that Sasavara (talk · contribs), the creator of the article titled Joel Vicent Joseph ("formerly Mr Puaz"), is a sockpuppet of Randyjoel (talk · contribs), who had created the articles Mr Puaz and MrPuaz four times under different accounts, resulting in the creation-protection of the two latter article titles.

I am seeking to either speedily delete the Joel Vicent Joseph article per criterion G5 or move it to draft space, but to proceed, I would need your permission to exclude from consideration either your significant edits to the article (Special:Diff/1330659903 and Special:Diff/1330658809) or your acceptance of the draft. Would you like to give me permission to speedily delete or draftify this article? — Newslinger talk 20:41, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Newslinger. You certainly don't need my permission - go ahead. qcne (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! — Newslinger talk 20:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

hello can i be paid for my work --Emmanuel Anane Principle (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi @Emmanuel Anane Principle! Wikipedia is a volunteer-run encyclopedia, which means that we don't get paid for our contributions.

If someone is paying you to edit Wikipedia, or you are editing on behalf of someone you have a pecuniary relationship with (such as your employer, a client, or similar), then you must follow the guidelines at WP:Paid-contribution disclosure before making such edits. Cheers, nil ^nz 02:51, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

how do i add a picture to an article? --Chezburgerzzz4 (talk) 22:13, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi @Chezburgerzzz4! You may find step-by-step guide useful if you're using the Visual Editor (which operates similar to word processor software), or this guide if you're using the Source Editor (which operates using mark up). Cheer, nil ^nz 02:59, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your absolutely amazing help in improving my understanding about wiki. You're a GOAT

Iamtaptwice (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! qcne (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

• Brendanconway
• Calmer Waters
• Hut 8.5
• Joe Roe
• VersedFenrir

CheckUser changes

Ks0stm

Oversight changes

Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the web archival service archive.today has been deprecated; links to the site should be removed.
• A request for comment is open to discuss retiring CSD criterion R3 in favour of handling such redirects through RfD.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
• Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
• The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2026 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: A09, AmandaNP, Barras, Count Count, M7, SHB2000, Teles and VIGNERON.
• An Unreferenced articles backlog drive is taking place in March 2026 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

---

How do I create a Wikipedia page? --Theren033 (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Theren033. I would strongly recommend not creating a new article as your first task on Wikipedia: it is very complicated and will likely lead to lots of frustration! If you do want to have a read of some guidance, I recommend Help:Your first article. Let me know if you have any more questions. qcne (talk) 20:41, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 12:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just read the Wikipedia entry about Woordrow Wilson H,S. in Los Angeles. I was a reader there from 1963-69. Our principal, Attilio Parisi, had done a GREAT job choosing teachers. The group I started with the 1963 included many amazing individuals; many of us had enormous respect for our students and enjoyed teaching in such a culturally diverse community. As I recall, our student population included about 75% Chicano, 15+ % Asian-Asian-American students and a small minority of Caucasian and African American students. I still have friends who were students then. I hope you will change the phrasing in the first paragraph to say SOME (teachers yadayada…) instead of “teachers” (implying it was many) .

.I am 85 and have difficulty using my iPad keyboard or I’d go back to the page where I tried to suggest the edit of inserting “some” before “teachers” . I’m sure I’m not the only former WWHS faculty/staff who remains in touch with students from that period.

 Also, I don’t think the article makes clear that the WWHS included grades 7-8 at that time.  WWHS separated from the bldg on Eastern Avenue  when the new WWHS was built up on Multnomah. --Pamela Hasegawa (talk) 13:48, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is my first time editing on Wikipedia. I was wondering what things I can do to improve Wikipedia for others including myself? Could you help me with some ideas or suggestions? --ÀAaaaaBAaaaaaa (talk) 03:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Karuuman's mentor Cyberdog958 is away.

Hello, how is a good article, and how can I make it? --Karuuman (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello how do I create citation --Political kophi (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bismark Takyi, popularly known as Political Kophi, is a young Ghanaian political enthusiast, commentator, and activist who is passionate about governance, leadership, and the development of his country. He is widely known for his bold opinions on political issues and his commitment to speaking for ordinary citizens.

Bismark Takyi was born on 23rd July 2004 at St. Mary’s Hospital in Drobo, Ghana. He hails from the small but vibrant community of Konsia, where he spent most of his early childhood and developed a strong sense of community and leadership.

He began his basic education at Konsia R/C Primary School and later continued to Konsia M/A Junior High School, where he developed an early interest in leadership, social issues, and public discussions. His passion for education and public service led him to pursue his secondary education at Bechem Presbyterian Senior High School, where he further nurtured his interest in politics, governance, and national development.

Currently, Bismark Takyi is pursuing higher education at the University of Cape Coast, one of Ghana’s respected institutions for academic excellence. While at the university, he continues to engage in political conversations, youth empowerment, and public commentary on governance.

Known online as Political Kophi, Bismark Takyi has built a reputation as a young voice in Ghanaian political discussions. As a member and supporter of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), he actively participates in political debates and discussions about national development. Despite his affiliation, he is recognized for openly criticizing policies and decisions of the incumbent government whenever he believes they do not serve the interests of the people.

Political Kophi believes that politics should focus on accountability, transparency, and the welfare of citizens. Through social media and public commentary, he aims to encourage young people to take interest in leadership, civic responsibility, and national development.

His --Political kophi (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how can I build a mini dam to power up my house --Pyalo Brian (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

منبع ایجاد کنید که بتواند بدون کمی کمک بزرگ به دانش آموزان باشد --سونا فیضی (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Karingkerontang’&@everyoneonmfb;cakk(Tga) --Mianheehajimannaluppken (talk) 08:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Burungkakaktua-/:sskumanayaspkxbulukkumbaiicxac --Mianheehajimannaluppken (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thoughts on Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/March 2026 proposal? There's some discussion on its talk and at WT:AIC#AI-bot on ANI Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 17:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]