User talk:This is Paul
Massimo Montanari
Hi, in Spaghetti#Sources could you add the wikilink to "Montanari, Massimo"? There's an article about him. The page is project. Thanks. ~2026-21283-9 (talk) 22:44, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Not sure how to do that without wrecking the reference. Your best bet would be to post this question at the talk page and I'm sure someone will do it for you. This is Paul (talk) 23:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- I saw this comment here and added the requested link. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Cheers for doing this. This is Paul (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- I saw this comment here and added the requested link. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
ReFill
Bots are nice and everything, but they often include errors since they depend on the metadata, which is often wholly incorrect. Please use the preview button and try to fix any errors before submitting. Bots are dumb. Mr.choppers | ✎ 05:58, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Mr.choppers: If you've checked my edit history you'll see that I generally review changes after running a page through Refill, so can you give me an example of what you mean? This is Paul (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- Here is a minor one (which repeated at three pages which is why I thought it worthwhile to contact you). Anyhow, you do seem to be using bots the right way so cheers and thanks. Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:02, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- ok no worries. I don't often change the website= parameter, tending to think that they're all available through an online source, but it would make sense to do it in the case of newspapers, magazines, etc. This is Paul (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Here is a minor one (which repeated at three pages which is why I thought it worthwhile to contact you). Anyhow, you do seem to be using bots the right way so cheers and thanks. Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:02, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 January 2026
- News and notes: Wikipedia's 25th anniversary is here!
Where does the time go?
- Special report: Wikipedia at 25: A Wake-Up Call
The internet is booming. We are not.
- Serendipity: The WMF wants to buy you books!
Really! A major triumph.
- WikiProject report: Time for a health check: the Vital Signs 2026 campaign
The campaign to get all of our top-importance medical articles up to B-class or above.
- In the media: Fake Acting President Trump and a Wikipedia infobox
D.J.T. assumes a new position.
- Community view: The inbox behind Wikipedia
What the Volunteer Response Team actually does!
- Recent research: Art museums on Wikidata; comparing three comparisons of Grokipedia and Wikipedia
And other research.
- Traffic report: Tonight I'm gonna rock you
A world in white gets underway.
- Comix: Oh come on man.
Really?
No Events
As you know, I add the phrase 'no entries' for years within my timelines where no notable event takes place, and I included it because it had been used previously on other timelines. However some Wikipedians (and IPs) remove them and putting them back is a bit of a nuisance. It is possible. or even likely, that events do take place in that year but are either not relevant or are not notable, for whatever reason, Therefore I was thinking about changing the phase from 'no events' to 'no notable events'. What do you think? Rillington (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2026 (UTC)