Hey @Maxwell Smart123321. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 7 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:06, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, can't believe it's been seven years! Thank you so much! Maxwell Smart¹²³³²¹ 04:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Maxwell Smart123321, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 08:01, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 08:01, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry to bother, I wasn't sure where best to raise this regarding the latest edit on Addison Rae. About this sentence: "Rae has also embraced a 1990s and Y2K aesthetic with high-saturated photoshoots and music reminiscent of Hilary Duff and Christina Aguilera."

After checking the cited source, it seems the comparison is only about the visual artwork, not the music. The article says: "The full-length is a nod to pop past and present, honouring these influences while not leaning too heavily on them. Even its high-saturation artwork is a homage to Y2K It girls including Hilary Duff and Christina Aguilera, with a pinch of grainy Tumblr aesthetics."

Additionally, the reference itself seems fairly broad/vague, just naming them as general Y2K "It girl" examples rather than making a clear stylistic or career comparison. Because of that, the current wording feels a bit misleading and possibly overstates what the source supports. Would it make more sense to either revise the sentence or remove it altogether unless more references are added? Thanks! JustThat1990 (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@JustThat1990: Hi, its not bother. On second look at the source you are right that it isn't necessarily talking about music so I think we can remove the music mention. However, the artwork is being compared to "Y2K It girls" so I think it is still worth mentioning Duff and Aguilera as examples of who those "It girls" may be. The section is artistry and artists often have comparisons and references made to other artists so its not a huge stretch I feel. Maybe a revised sentence singling out that the source is talking about the debut album's cover such as: "Rae has also embraced a 1990s and Y2K aesthetic with high-saturated photoshoots. Her debut album's cover was described as an homage to 'Y2K It girls' including Hilary Duff and Christina Aguilera".. Maxwell Smart¹²³³²¹ 21:05, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I still wonder a bit whether this detail needs that much emphasis with only one fairly broad source, but your revised wording is definitely clearer and more accurate. JustThat1990 (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]