User talk:Lois Hacker

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Diannaa (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Lilburne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unconverted urls

Many thanks for some good work on Thomas Fairfax. Please can you remember not to leave unconverted urls. We generally don't like unconverted urls per WP:BAREURL, although it is good you are leaving additional information. There are quite a few unconverted urls on Gregory Clement, Hercules Huncks and Robert Lilburne as well. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 10:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to leave me an example of what you consider a bare url. As you know, I am quite new to Wikipedia and the formatting standards here are not exactly what I am used to. Lois Hacker (talk) 12:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - Sure. In this example the url remains bare:[1] but in this example you cannot see the url.[2] In the article on John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough, which is a featured article, you cannot see the urls. It is really just a matter of keeping things tidy. Dormskirk (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you are talking about enclosing the URl in brackets, I'm familiar with this.
However, I see that a number of my citations have been changed to a completely different format that I can't work with, as well as setting up potential edit conflicts. I will not be able to continue if these are not reverted. Lois Hacker (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Foster, Joseph. Pedigrees of the County Families of Yorkshire. London: W Wilfred Head, 1874. https://archive.org/details/pedigreesofcount01fost/page/n115/mode/2up
  2. ^ Foster, Joseph (1874). Pedigrees of the County Families of Yorkshire. London: W. Wilfred Head.
It is not a matter of enclosing the url in brackets: it is a matter of making them invisible. I have already done it for you for all references that you have added. Please just take a look at what I have done: take a look at the article on the John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough for another example. Dormskirk (talk) 13:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see that I will not be able to continue with this. I find that I can not undo the changes from the History page. The rewrite as I have planned it would take weeks. The potential for edit conflicts adds too much wasted time. Lois Hacker (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - That's a pity. There is a simple alternative which is not as good. If you have a URL (web page) link, you can add it to the title part of the citation, so that when you add the citation to Wikipedia the URL becomes hidden and the title becomes clickable. To do this, enclose the URL and the title in square brackets—the URL first, then a space, then the title. For example:[1] Dormskirk (talk) 13:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ IARC Monographs On The Evaluation Of Carcinogenic Risks To Humans – Doxefazepam. International Agency For Research On Cancer (IARC). 66: 97–104. 13–20 February 1996.
That is what I was talking about, the URL in brackets. Lois Hacker (talk) 13:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Please go ahead then. Dormskirk (talk) 13:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, I can see too much downside here in continuing. Lois Hacker (talk) 14:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK That's a pity. Dormskirk (talk) 14:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia: BAREURL "Wikipedia:Citation templates are popular but not required. Any method showing more information than is present in the URL itself is not a bare URL. Full citations are preferred, but even an incomplete citation is not necessarily a bare URL. Some citation styles, such as the MLA style, use full bibliographic citation that happen to display the text of the URL in addition to proper identifying information, like the author, date, and title of the publication. These are not considered bare URLs." Lois Hacker (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's why I used the term "unconverted url". You won't find any visible urls in good or featured articles. Dormskirk (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also according to WP:Citation templates "Because templates can be contentious, editors should not add citation templates, or change an article with a consistent citation format to another, without gaining consensus." Dormskirk (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of engaging in an edit war here. I am not going to continue my improvement of this biography, so the issue is moot. Lois Hacker (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK. No problem. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 15:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Huncks (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MWFwiki was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm not sure what we have here meets WP:BIO. I mean, his knighthood — arguably the primary reason for his notability — is entirely glossed-over in the body of the article. I understand his military service details are "scant" — something which needs a citation, itself... you can't just unilaterally declare the details to be scant, even if they de facto are — but this would, again, arguably be where the weight of his notability would be. Find more information on his service and we may be in a better spot.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MWFwiki (talk) 22:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas Huncks

Information icon Hello, Lois Hacker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas Huncks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Huncks

Hello, Lois Hacker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Thomas Huncks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:12, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lois_Hacker