User talk:Beejamjam
Your nomination of Great Blow is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Great Blow is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- An interesting article to read, thank you for your work on it! I am an experienced Wikipedian and I live in Norwich, and so will take a quick look at the article to see if any obvious tweaks can be made. Please revert or message me if I make any errors. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that! I'd be open to doing anything collaborative when it comes to Norfolk and would like to see if I can help revive WikiProject East Anglia so let me know if you'd like to be involved in that! Beejamjam (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Portsmouth Pride for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portsmouth Pride until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.aaronneallucas (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Beejamjam. Thank you for your work on Portsmouth Pride. Another editor, Aplucas0703, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nominated for deletion for a lack of notability.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
aaronneallucas (talk) 16:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Beejamjam. Thank you for your work on Gibbeting of Stephen Watson. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for this very interesting article, important for the 18th century history of Norfolk and in the history of law and punishment in the UK. It would now be helpful to link it from other pages. I agree with your choice of title; Gibetting is the key distinguishing feature and having it in the title seems reasonable.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 09:01, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
WIkiProject Doctor Who: December 2025 Newsletter
The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume III, Issue III — December 2025 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who Help! We've been robbed... of a new Doctor Who Christmas special this year :(
2025... I Let You Go
*vworp vworp, vworp vworp*
The Space-Time Telepgraph is back again with our final issue of the year. With 13-episodes of Who-related content broadcast in 2025, it marked the biggest year in the Whoniverse since 2017! Take a quick read below for all the Wikipedia-related (and non-Wikipedia-related) Doctor Who news that you missed, and everything you have to look forward to. Happy New Year! 🥳🎉 Would you like a
Intelligence Bulletin from the Subwave Network
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹
2019
2020
2021
2022
Their songs have ended... but their stories never end 🌹 (continued) 2023
2024
2025
Notes
Contributors:
If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.
If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User talk:JamJamSvn and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Beejamjam. Thank you for your work on Norfolk Carnyx Hoard. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for this article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ingratis (talk) 14:57, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Great Blow has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Great Blow has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Danilo!!! Beejamjam (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
February 2026
Your edit to Great Blow has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Diannaa Oh whoops, too close to the original. I'm usually good at adding the info in a new way but must have taken my eyes off the ball. Will try again! Beejamjam (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Beejamjam. Thank you for your work on James Cliffen. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for this well-written article. A murder in the 18th century isn't often notable, but the lasting impact (given the Norwich Castle Museum display gives his execution lasting impact.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 13:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of Epstein class for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epstein class, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epstein class until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)