Hi Galihauli. Thank you for your work on Douglas Natelson. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Almost no e of this page has sources. Please add these, or the page should go back to being a draft.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Peter J. Rossky. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vegantics, he is NAS, this is an automatic notability. Please revert or I will. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert, as NAS he is highly notable. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Aditya Mohite. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 21:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vegantics, please revert, same as in other cases, these are very inappropriate draftifications of notable academics. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:45, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Douglas Natelson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 21:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vegantics, also a highly inappropriate draftification. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jun Lou. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vegantics (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vegantics, I am extremely perplexed by your draftification of Draft:Jun Lou; if there was any question I would have tagged this on March 4th when I cleaned up some minor peacock. Based upon both being an editor-in-chief of a significant journal (WP:NPROF#C8) and his publication record with an h-factor of 111 (WP:NPROF#C1) he qualifies as notable. At most a couple of his awards could do with citations, or they could have been removed as those which are not sourced are minor. I suggest reverting your draftification, or would you rather that I do? Ldm1954 (talk) 22:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is your area of expertise, I’m happy to defer to you. The fact that the user only seems to edit about Rice University faculty and uses a promotional tone suggested WP:COI while the over reliance on primary sources and sourcing references from ChatGPT suggested a lack of reliable sources that would meet WP:NBIO. However I don’t have a strong opinion or objections to your reverting my draftifications. Vegantics (talk) 22:50, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i will revert them. It is WP:NPROF that matters, not WP:NBIO. Often the only reliable source for academics is their university -- there are legal implications to lying on them. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the clarification and your thoughtful replies. Vegantics (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Galihauli, I strongly urge that you declare your affiliation with Rice (assuming that there is one). This does not preclude you from writing articles about notable academics at Rice, but it can lead to problems if there are indications that you are doing this for pay. Please read WP:COI carefully. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Galihauli. Thank you for your work on Peter J. Rossky. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add the tagged sources

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Rice Advanced Materials Institute, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Rice_University#Research_centers_and_resources. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]