User talk:Dissident93

Tales of soundtracks

About the games I added, they are not reusing musics. Go look Tales of Breaker, Tales of Commons or Tales of Wahrheit up. They are full fledged original Tales of games with their own musics. That's like saying Tales of Rebirth or Tales of Arise's musics are only remixes. Spinoffs games like Tales of the Heroes Twin Brave or Tales of VS, only features remixes from main games but are on the page. No reasons why Tales of Wahrheit, a mainline entry with a fully original soundtrack, cannot be cited too.Leptitgay (talk) 00:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not super familiar with the series and go mostly by official soundtrack credits. As long as they include original music by Sakuraba then it should be fine, although it's still technically WP:OR unless it can be verified. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball player infobox

Please do not remove the state from the high school field (as you did with Jamir Watkins). This infobox uses City, State format consistently in this field. Thanks. Rikster2 (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's redundant if it's the same as birthplace. NFL infoboxes (and probably others) follow that format, but if it must be used for basketball ones then at least use a nowrap parameter to avoid unnecessary linebreaks. — Dissident93 (talk) 21:37, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Living People category

Because it always becomes a death date so it’s in a constant spot for an individual, living or dead. If alphabetical it’s the only category that moves when a person “changes status,” the rest stay in a constant place unless renamed. Rikster2 (talk) 16:57, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apology

I unintentionally reverted your changes to National Football League. Assadzadeh (talk) 21:03, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It happens to me too. — Dissident93 (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: One of your edits in Grok

Good day!

About the line: "In July 2025, Tesla released a software update adding Grok to its vehicles."

This line was previously "In July 2025, Tesla rolled out the 2025.26 software update adding Grok to its vehicles."

I understand changing "rolled out" to 'released' but why remove "2025.26"? It's the actual name of the update and provides context for when 2025.26 appears later in the Access section of the article. I'd like to know your reasoning to avoid going back-and-forth with edits. Inhospitable (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policies favor clarity and accessibility for a general audience. Names of software updates like 2025.26 really only have meaning for Tesla owners. "In July 2025, Tesla released a software update (version 2025.26) adding Grok to its vehicles" gives less weight to it while still being mentioned. — Dissident93 (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense, thanks for clarifying. That indeed seems a better way to write it. ~ Inhospitable (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template:Infobox film

Please undo your recent change. It put every film article with a "File:" in the infobox image parameter into Category:Articles with missing files, over a thousand in total. None of these are actually broken image links. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:13, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The number of affected articles is still rising. When it hits 2000, I'm going to go ask someone else. Sumanuil. (talk to me)
This is fixed, by the way (next time, Sumanuil, please put in a TPER so the response is faster).
I am greatly concerned by the modification attempt in Special:Diff/1306446384. For a page that is trancluded on 160k pages, you must sandbox stuff like this. Please do not let this sort of thing happen again. Primefac (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I'm aware this particular edit couldn't have been tested in sandbox (including the unintended maintenance category additions) as it was meant to expose infobox images to search previews which use live articles, but it turns out that non-free images can't be used as pageimages anyway. I haven't been online in a few days or I would have caught it myself. — Dissident93 (talk) 22:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are many ways to test sandboxes, even if they need to be used in live pages to see if they work. For example, if there is no other way, you can replace an infobox template in an article with its sandbox equivalent, using a clear edit summary saying that you are testing the infobox. Once the test is done, revert your test edit. It's not the usual way to test sandboxes, but sometimes it is the only way to make sure it works. If you have reverted and make further changes to the sandbox, you can usually view the old version of the page to see if your new change works as intended. I recommend a low-traffic article for testing like this. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:14, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestions, I figured it was possible to do but everything appeared to be working when I did do a quick test. Pageimage caches needed to be updated, which was out of my control if this were to work, or I would have caught it before others did. — Dissident93 (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-humor

Hi there, D93. I'll leave the lower case for 'first and second teams' alone. Hopefully, me adding 'first stints' will not make you lose sleep, lol. Anything I edit is not done in a sneaky way. P.S. Hope you put Mr. Daniels up soon. I will keep a look out for that one! Regards, John. (Bringingthewood)

It's a pet peeve that seemingly only I try to fix. We don't tend to write them like this in prose and MOS:CAPS prefers the use of generic nouns and adjectives if possible. First-team is styled like this if it's the first entry on a line, but that no longer becomes the case when using multiples (). As for (first stint), I removed them as (second stint) already implies a prior stint. — Dissident93 (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, I always knew you had your reasons. Bottom line, I'd rather see an IP in the revision history and not your name .. no guilt. ;) Like I said earlier, never sneaky. Thanks for the reply and here's to seeing a STAR soon on a certain players page!! John. Bringingthewood (talk) 22:28, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Duskbloods publisher

Hi there, so I noticed you reverted all the edits on The Duskbloods page stating that FromSoftware was the publisher and not Nintendo.

Just want to remind you there's actually a post on the game's talk page that discusses the publisher issue (basically, the dedicated pages for the game on both the Nintendo of America and Nintendo of Europe websites only list FromSoftware as the publisher, which contradicts the game's press release page stating it's a joint-publishing deal between FromSoft and Nintendo), so I thought this might be something worth looking into. TerrapinLoverWikipedia (talk) 16:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of a talk page post for it, actually. — Dissident93 (talk) 23:47, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Close .. very close.

I think you're close also, D93. Just remember .. if you gotta play at garden parties ... Bringingthewood (talk) 03:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with these nominations .. but will something go to the whole NFL page for a vote over time? At the nomination page it looks like a 2–1 vote.. and Gonzo put forth great input moving this along. You may say that you're doing the finishing touches on it .. I don't know. Not sure on the amount of editors needed. Hope it all goes well and I don't want to see it die on the vine. John. Bringingthewood (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not technically a vote and is up to the discretion of whoever has the power to close them. If there is a base level of support and no clear opposition, they usually get promoted. — Dissident93 (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I'll leave the latest IP tinkering of Chase Young to you. The lead, infobox and article show all three team names. I know he was drafted when they were called the Redskins, but then my eyes start to hurt. Regards. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! I am in the process of creating {{Infobox gridiron football biography}} as per the recent tfd. I’ve made some significant headway and have a number of testcases created. I see you are a leading contributor to {{Infobox NFL biography}}. I’d love to get your input and have you take a look at the template if you have time. Could always use another set of eyes. Thanks in advance. - Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you base the new infobox off an older version of the NFL one? I had planned to just merge any CFL unique ones to it, as it included a lot of small edits (like a caption gap fix) that were lost. — Dissident93 (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like there should be some discussion before this changeis implemented to Template:Infobox basketball biography. I don’t think articles read correctly without the word “pick” in there. From your edit summary it sounded like perhaps there was an issue you were fixing - I’d like to understand why the change was made. Thanks Rikster2 (talk) 16:30, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It should either be overall or pick as it seems self-evident when presented with a numeric value; both together seemed redundant. — Dissident93 (talk) 20:12, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree with that. Right now it is unclear about what the "overall" refers to - example Mark Price is the "2nd round, 25th overall" - 25th what (for a reader not steeped in basketball)? And if you remove "overall" and replace with "pick," then the reader is left to wonder if it is the 25th pick overall or the 25th pick in the second round (both of which are conceptually possible). I don't think this is a minor change and think it should be discussed at WP:NBA before being implemented. Rikster2 (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

Careful of Category:Articles using duplicate arguments in template calls… - Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:53, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Couple tools you might find useful…
Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:56, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong birthplaces

Hello Dissident93; happy football season. Please try to refrain from "guessing" player's birthplaces without verification, as you did here. None of the three sources confirm his birthplace as Clover, South Carolina, which he only moved to in high school. In fact, the Athletic NFL Draft Guide specifically says he was born in an entirely different county. I've started a discussion here where I better explain my reasoning and motivation. Cheers and thank you, JTtheOG (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For your excellent work on Infobox gridiron football biography. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you deserve credit too for helping find CFL-specific issues that I would have overlooked as I only focus on the NFL. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great job with the shortform positions. I don't have to type out [Safety (gridiron football position)|Safety] anymore. You're a legend for that. At Sean McDermott, all I did was type "s". lol ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's going to be extremely useful. It made me want a page on assistant football coaches; maybe that's the next goal once these edits slow down. — Dissident93 (talk) 04:25, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think you could do the "Title" thing on the basketball infoxbox too? I can't imagine there will be anyone who will oppose it. Seems pretty straighforward. See Doc Rivers ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done and also added the pluralize template. I might need to swap the logic for coaches that don't use |career_position= (can't think of any). I was going to ask Bagumba if we could use the new gridiron bio template as a base to cleanup the basketball one, but we'd need WP:NBA consensus when it comes to removing/adding parameters. — Dissident93 (talk) 21:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I always thought the "Playing career" and "Coaching career" parameters on the NBA infobx were redundant. See Doc Rivers. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's things like that I'd like to cleanup but the NBA community doesn't seem to mind it. — Dissident93 (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox gridiron football team

Heyooo. Hope you've been well. You did such a stellar job with initially helping me out and then taking over Template:Infobox gridiron football biography. I wanted to see if I could recruit you for another project? This tfd has us merging 7 different gridiron football team templates to the newly formed {{Infobox gridiron football team}}. I started looking at it the other night and decided that it might be a bit more than I'm willing to take on, at least by myself, at this juncture. Curious if you had any interest in taking it on? If so, I'd be more than happy to help out in any way I can. Let me know? - Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:58, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be busy for the next few days, but I don't mind helping at all. I haven't looked at the other templates yet but the majority of them seem to already be based on the NFL one, so it shouldn't take too much effort. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome! I think like with the biography there are few unique parameters to each template but the base code and layout is pretty much copied and pasted between them. I'm going to let you run with this one, but please ping me with any questions, problems, code reviews, etc. that I can help with! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, I'll try to get around to it sometime after Saturday then. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've been more busy than expected, but I'm still planning to finish this sometime over the next few days if possible. Seems like the majority of the work is making sure the uniform display look consistent as some don't use images. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries at all mate. Whenever you get to it. Just ping me if I can help in anyway! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

heyooo

Question for ya. With this edit you removed support for |image_width= citing MOS:IMAGE. I have no issue with the sizedefault, but why remove the image width? it is a VERY common parameter. Nearly every infobox has it. It came to my attention because it blew up Category:Pages using infobox shopping mall with unknown parameters (17). Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the parameter is meant specifically for landscaped photos then I suppose it's fine, although a more dynamic option like upright for them would be best. I've re-added it, but I'm fairly sure at least half of those articles using it don't actually need to. A good example would be Central Rama 2. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be sure. One of my pet projects is cleaning out CAT:UNKNOWNs. So when I see a category suddenly go from a few dozen pages to a few hundred, it catches my attention. Thanks for the explanation! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably worth creating dedicated categories for |image_size= and its variants once removed to avoid dumping potentially 1,000s of articles into something meant more for typos and made-up parameters. In fact, I'll try to do that from now on. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Suggestion? try using {{#invoke:Check for deprecated parameters|check}}... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t create the WP:SEAOFBLUE with the birthplace and there is nothing compelling dropping the state from HS location. Rikster2 (talk) 01:48, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don't usually repeat states/subdivisions in prose after first mention, so why should infoboxes take exception when space is more important there? The NFL/gridiron infobox now follows this format and I, conversely, don't see a compelling reason to not apply it everywhere as reducing redundancy should be considered WP:COMMONSENSE. — Dissident93 (talk) 02:19, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you say right in your bio that you don’t prefer to seek consensus and clearly that is the case. You can’t take decisions made by one group of project editors and then assume it is fine for a completely different project’s editors (who have typically had their own discussions about format). It is about having a consistent format for info display that doesn’t vary. It also doesn’t follow that the city name in one place is always the same as in another. Los Angeles is one case, but what about Springfield or Richmond or Kansas City? Those city names exist in more than one state. Rikster2 (talk) 05:15, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why you are making a claim of me not seeking consensus for edits? Re-read WP:BOLD if that's the case. There was already consensus for this for NFL/gridiron players, so why would basketball be any different? Context alone should already be enough here; if a player was born in Los Angeles, California, and attended high school in Los Angeles, Texas, then it would be listed like that. — Dissident93 (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the above-mentioned article, one of your edit summaries was "...in fact we should probably just list natural or artificial turf since a lot of this means little to the general reader." As a matter of fact, as I was editing the article yesterday, I was thinking the same thing. Also, you'll note that for the Special event stadiums it just lists a generic "Grass" (for most) or "artificial turf" (for one). So, unless you think anyone will object, I will change them. Assadzadeh (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it could be footnoted to keep the details somewhere, but I don't think the general reader cares much about the specific brand of artificial turf used. Nice work on the article by the way. — Dissident93 (talk) 18:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

College Football

Hey. Just FYI, with this edit, you absolutely blew up Category:Pages using infobox gridiron football biography with unknown parameters (2). Are you planning to support any of these params? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A simple bot request fix should fix this. @WikiOriginal-9: helped clean it up before seemingly without issue. I'll get around to it soon if not, unless it's considered critical. — Dissident93 (talk) 03:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just curious if those parameters should be removed or if you overlooked them during the merge... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
|major, bowlgames, cbs, si, yahoo, and rivals all need removed. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stellar. Perhaps a task for PrimeBOT? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:54, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think you broke the template. The reserve lists and practice squads were not displaying. I reverted it back to the last clean version since I couldn't figure out what the problem was. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been away for a bit but I'll try to sync it with the current one. — Dissident93 (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It should work as intended now, seems like I forgot to keep the older case-sensitive parameters (|practice_squad=, |taxi=, and |reserve_lists=). I should be more active here again, so if this wasn't what you meant then let me know and hopefully the next fix won't take a month. — Dissident93 (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The CFL practice squad note thingy and the gridiron team infobox merge still need done if you're interested. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I haven't forgotten about them. I'll try and see if I can get both fixed before the end of the year. — Dissident93 (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe not as quickly as I thought. Anybody else is free to take them up I just haven't had much time lately and don't want to hold anything up if I can't commit to it. I still plan to get to them eventually. — Dissident93 (talk) 02:18, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requests over at Module talk:Gridiron color

Hello Dissident93, when you have an available moment, would you please implement my proposed historical & current HTML color code changes for the Carolina Panthers, Denver Broncos & Las Vegas Raiders over at Module talk:Gridiron color? CharlesEditor23 (talk) 01:52, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Dissident93, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,

Red Director (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Red Director (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Late, but Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to yourself too. — Dissident93 (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in

Heyo. Happy New Year. Just checking in... You still planning to work on Template:Infobox gridiron football team? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year. Sorry, I haven't forgotten and still plan to finish it there's just been a lot going on in my personal life the last few weeks/months, so I haven't been as active as I used to be. Things should be settled enough now though, so I'll try and get it tomorrow. — Dissident93 (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to hear it. Personal life has to come first. Hope all is well. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:04, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's nothing bad, just prevented me from spending more free time here which hopefully should no longer be an issue moving forward. — Dissident93 (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Zackmann08: Yeah, sorry about the super long wait. Template:Infobox gridiron football team should be ready for a bot to rename everything now (once the NFL one gets renamed to it). I'll check for any renaming issues, but all of the other templates should have full backwards compatibility in label naming but match the modern NFL one. — Dissident93 (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Fernando Mendoza, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read MOS:GEOLINK properly. One part of it says link only the first unit.. The Buffalo, New York, United States one is only an example of a title that ends in City, Region. It is not a Manual of Style for how to link certain countries geographic places. Servite et contribuere (talk) 19:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Was there a discussion anywhere to clarify this? It links Buffalo, New York, United States when Quothquan, South Lanarkshire, Scotland isn't, so I'm just following exactly what the MOS lists. City, state has always been linked in prose without issue. — Dissident93 (talk) 02:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you reverted it back. While I assume you made it in good faith, I think a lot of people might not understand it. The article is titled Boston. Not Boston, Massachusetts. The difference is not country, it is article title. The city in Scotland is titled Quothquan with nothing else. Buffalo has the state name in title. Boston and Miami do not have the state name in title. MOS:GEOLINK says only the first geographic location should be linked. Buffalo, New York, United States is used as an example to say, if state is in the article title, it should be linked together and if the state is not linked, it should not. Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:44, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
GEOLINK is explicitly about not adding multiple links to a single series of territorial units. There's nothing in GEOLINK that says Boston, Massachusetts is better than Boston, Massachusetts (or vice versa) – just that we shouldn't do Boston, Massachusetts. OceanGunfish (talk) 15:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Anyways OceanGunfish, whatever which way it goes, it might be a good idea to further discuss GEOLINK. Anyways, I personally disagree with linking it as Boston, Massachusetts over Boston, Massachusetts. And the same with linking it as Miami, Florida over Miami, Florida. I honestly don't see any reason for or against it either way, other than some editors might be confused about GEOLINK and will have to enter edit in order to check whether they believe it is correct. Well it is good to have people who have expertise in certain areas of Wikipedia. Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:45, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It should be discussed there to clarify if states need to be linked or not, because your interpretation seems to be wrong based on what the MOS is showing. Personally, I'd just link the city and omit the state in prose to solve both issues but the MOS doesn't agree. — Dissident93 (talk) 00:48, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Mets' Steve Cohen

Hi Dissident93, I saw that you are part of WP:WPBIO and have been active on a lot of sports-related personalities. I hoped you would be interested in the Mets' Steve Cohen as well. I put up an edit request here with my thoughts about how to update his career section and bring it more within the guidelines for a BLP. As an editor with a lot of experience, would you mind taking a look and implementing the changes if you agree? Thanks, Mrsnewyork (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dissident93, I'm following up on your offer to review my request for Steve Cohen's BLP. I'm sure you're very busy, so if you agree with my proposed changes, I'm happy to take this off your plate and make the changes myself. Thank you Mrsnewyork (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look at it now. I'll apply a cleanup at the very least. — Dissident93 (talk) 04:43, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dissident93, thanks for starting to clean up Steve Cohen's page. Did you also have a chance to review my suggestions? If you agree that they help improve the article, let me know if it would be helpful for me to make the changes. On a similar note, I noticed that you moved some external links to Personal life - are you planning to integrate them into the text? I think this article has a lot of potential, and I look forward to further collaboration. Mrsnewyork (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Can you fix in the gridiron infobox where tackle is auto displaying as offensive tackle. See Tom Chantiles. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't nest israeli categories inside jewish categories

I've removed Category:Israeli hip-hop record producers from Category:Jewish hip-hop record producers. Although there are a lot of overlapping members, the norm for categories is to add the individual isaeril people to the jewish category rather than the entire nation state. Thanks! SMasonGarrison 13:51, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have no recollection of this, but good to know. Categories have always been a mess to enforce as some things are non-diffusing when they shouldn't be and vice versa. — Dissident93 (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
For your work merging the old infoboxes into Template:Infobox gridiron football team. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]