Talk:Williams Cone

GA review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:39, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Williams Cone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 18:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 18:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

I have a ref question and a suggestion. It's been a while since you nominated it, so fresh eyes might be a good thing. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

Sourcing and spot checks

Reviewed: 12, 14, 20, 22, 30

[22] Is this page number correct for Souther 1990 or Souther 1992?

No other issues.

It was supposed to be Souther 1992, not Souther 1990. Volcanoguy 19:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images

All images are appropriately licensed. Encouragement: Add alt text.

I don't see anything about alt text in the good article criteria. Volcanoguy 19:40, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's why it's listed as an encouragement (it's not necessary for GA status). Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:20, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Williams_Cone