Talk:Jess Tjeerdsma

Good articleJess Tjeerdsma has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 15, 2025Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 20, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jess Tjeerdsma died on the day after he resigned from the South Dakota Senate?

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Jess Tjeerdsma/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Roc0ast3r (talk · contribs) 00:53, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Zzz plant (talk · contribs) 14:18, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roc0ast3r, thanks for your work on this article. I will review it and should have some comments posted shortly. Zzz plant (talk) 14:18, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your fast responses! All my prose comments have been resolved, I think the new addition to lede + small rephrase in body all work nicely. The only thing of note is that there isn't an image, but fwiw I looked around and couldn't find a suitably licensed one. I assume you did too, and if there isn't one available that's not a barrier to GA. The only new thing I noticed was the findagrave link at the bottom - I've seen these get challenged or removed through WP:FINDAGRAVE-EL but I also know it's not a hard rule, do you think there's a particular value to it in this case? Best, Zzz plant (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzz plant: Thank you for your review! I had to tend to personal matters while editing, so I did cut it off a bit early, but I was able to find what I believe to be a public domain image of Tjeerdsma, which I have gone ahead and added. I actually wasn't aware of the Find a Grave rule, but since the Find a Grave profile includes an image of his grave (admittedly, not the greatest, but still an image nonetheless), I think it should stay. I wouldn't try to fight it however if someone removed the link.  RONIN  TALK  03:10, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks for adding the image, I've updated the notes/progress box accordingly. I don't know that the grave photo adds anything particular to the story here, as it looks like a pretty typical headstone, but I don't think there's any categorical reason it must be deleted since there's no copyvio in the findagrave profile. The only remaining suggestion I have is to add archive links - optional but encouraged to prevent link rot, and I believe can be automated by queuing up an IAbot run. Since the article meets all the GA criteria, will be passing this momentarily. Nice work! Zzz plant (talk) 03:41, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Text

Lede

Life and career

Sourcing

Formatting

Reliability

Spot check

in-line ref #s as of this revision

Scope

Neutrality

Stability

Illustration

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dclemens1971 (talk22:54, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Roc0ast3r (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

 RONIN  TALK  00:46, 16 December 2025 (UTC).[reply]

All yours my friend. JTtheOG (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.
Overall: GA'd recently. No policy issues noted. Well-written & interesting hook; good work! Staraction (talk · contribs) 22:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]