Fortnight (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 24, 2024 Good article nominee Not listed April 17, 2025 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 17, 2025. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Google searches for the word "fortnight" in the US increased by 868% on the release day of the song "Fortnight" by Taylor Swift?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Taylor Swift Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does the music video reference Clara Bow's institutionalization? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif talk 03:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• ... that Google searches for the word "fortnight" in the US increased by 868% on the release day of the song "Fortnight" by Taylor Swift?

• Source: The Independent

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jefferson Fisher

Improved to Good Article status by Ippantekina (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

Ippantekina (talk) 02:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Was the video released after Eras tour concluded? I know it was prrformed during the tour from the photo in the article Antignomi (talk) 10:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the article adult contemporary, it is clear that AC is a radio format rather than a genre, citing Encyclopedia of Radio, Continuum Encylopedia of Popular Music of the World. The lead says, The exact assemblage of adult contemporary music has varied based on trends in popular music. Given its dubious genre categorisation, I don't think it's helpful to include AC as a genre, despite the "adult contemporary" classification given by Pitchfork. Pinging @InsiderChiari: here for discussion. Ippantekina (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. I do see your point, but adult contemporary has been used as a genre on Wikipedia for years. The portion "Adult contemporary was originally established as a continuation of the easy listening and soft rock sounds from the 1960s and 1970s, usually focusing on songs with varying degrees of easy listening, pop, soul, R&B, quiet storm, and rock influence. In the 1990s, adult contemporary began to accommodate a hotter sound more inclusive of contemporary pop songs, and develop sub-categories devoted towards specific genres" from the article definitely does make it seem like a genre. I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I just believe we should be consistent and since adult contemporary has been used as a genre on Wikipedia for years it may be easier to keep it that way. InsiderChiari (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]