This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. England This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Christianity This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women in Red This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBTQ+ studies: Person This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

	Guild of Copy Editors
This article was copy edited by PrinceTortoise, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 11 March 2025.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://lgbtqreligiousarchives.org/profiles/cecilia-eggleston. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:39, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cecilia Eggleston/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: GnocchiFan (talk · contribs) 10:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dclemens1971 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Unfortunately, as I began examining this article, I found two instances of copyright violation, one an outright copyright violation and another an instance of close paraphrasing; see here. As a result, this article quickfails its GA review under criterion 2 (prior to the review... It contains copyright violations). Separate from this quickfail, the article has several other areas for improvement before it can reach GA status; see notes below.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead is exceptionally short.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Quickfailed for copyright violation and CLOP so did not do a detailed source assessment. However, the article also relies heavily on a primary source ([1]), which can be used to support certain non-contested facts but which should not be relied on to support so much of an article.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The whole article is insufficiently broad in the treatment of its subject. For a biography, it contains very little biographical information and is composed primarily of regurgigation of her official bio and repetition of a few media quotes provided by the subject.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Did not assess due to quickfail for copyvio

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images are included.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Thanks to the nominator for submitting this! I regret it cannot be passed as a GA at this time but I hope you'll resubmit in the future after these issues are addressed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

   Thank you for your review, I appreciate the comments made. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]