Talk:British Raj

Former good article nomineeBritish Raj was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2012Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
June 6, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
November 2, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 15, 2007, August 15, 2008, August 15, 2009, and August 15, 2010.
Current status: Former good article nominee


Flag and Emblem

The flag nor the emblem are represented in the info box. I believe it'd be helpful and informative if they're added. Lucky1201 (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly support this, and I see no reason to not. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There was no flag nor emblem for the Raj (=British India + Princely States). Please read the numerous talk page archives in which the same question has been asked many times before. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 01:30, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with F&F. Why are so many editors obsessed with such trivia??? Johnbod (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you, the editors are being very picky tho. ~2026-53902-3 (talk) 14:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Famines during British Raj and the outlook of British government

British Raj and their systematic loot, exploitation, torture and treachery lead to many famines, epidemics that today's world can't even imagine. Other that highlighting colonial leaders injustice and specifically Churchill's deathly attitude to the Indians should be highlighted. This article highlighted their medical college building nature. ~2026-68949-9 (talk) 08:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Preceded From

British Raj took powers from the hands of Company rule by the Government of India Act 1858, by which powers was transferred from company executive to the direct British crown and not from Mughal Empire. So in my opinion, British India or British Raj only preceded from Company rule alone. So only Company rule must be present. Curious man123 (talk) 03:29, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]