Igor Bukhman (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

I am now writing the missing billionaires from the latest Forbes ranking (see my page). Some already have articles about them in non-English versions of Wikipedia. Igor Bukhman is one of those. I only see that Igor Bukhman was deleted by Ged UK because it was created by a blocked editor.

As of 2022, the Bukhmans are ranked #3 and #4 on the list of the richest Israelis. There is a good article (ru:Бухман, Игорь Анатольевич on Russian Wikipedia. And I have created short stub (User:Rotterdamned/Igor Bukhman). His biography does not equal the history of the company, it cannot be pushed into an article about Playrix. Rotterdamned (talk) 14:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow creation of draft or article but no action at DRV is required for that purpose because no judgment was made as to notability. The G5 does not prevent creation of a new article by an editor in good standing. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Rotterdamned: I'm not sure exactly what you're asking for with these requests. If you want to move your draft version to mainspace then you don't need to come here to do it. In general you don't need to get permission before recreating a deleted page, regardless of the reason for deletion. If your version also qualifies for deletion for some reason then it can be deleted, but that would be true if you weren't recreating a deleted page. These pages were deleted because the author is banned, which doesn't stop any editor who isn't banned from writing an article about the subject and doesn't mean the topic is unsuitable for Wikipedia. Deletion review is only really necessary if you want the old versions of these pages to be restored, but that doesn't sound like what you're asking for. Hut 8.5 18:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Unnecessary request/wrong venue. If you want to move the article into mainspace, just do it. If you want to submit it for review, put {{subst:submit}} at the top. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Okay, I got it! The problem was that the articles about the brothers were originally created by the blocked editor and not that they did not have enough significance. And if there are no restrictions, I will recreate the article. --Rotterdamned (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Not in scope for DRV. People should not think that DRV is a gate that needs passing, or that approval at DRV gives any protection.

The article has been created at 5278 bytes in a single edit, and attribution is a concern. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So? Attribution is only needed to attribute the content to the author, the article was created by Rotterdamned and consists entirely of material written by Rotterdamned in a sandbox, so the attribution requirements are satisfied. Hut 8.5 08:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that. All ok then. Still, advise Rotterdamned to note in the edit summary where the text came from. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Bukhman (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

I am now writing the missing billionaires from the latest Forbes ranking (see my page). Some already have articles about them in non-English versions of Wikipedia. Dmitry Bukhman is one of those. Now the article Dmitry Bukhman redirects to the Playrix. I did not understand from the edit history what happened there, but I assume it was deleted for about the same reasons as Igor Bukhman's article was deleted. It says it was created by a blocked author.

As of 2022, the Bukhmans are ranked #3 and #4 on the list of the richest Israelis. There is a good article (ru:Бухман, Дмитрий Анатольевич on Russian Wikipedia. And I have created short stub (User:Rotterdamned/Dmitry Bukhman). His biography does not equal the history of the company, it cannot be pushed into an article about Playrix. Rotterdamned (talk) 14:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow review of draft

. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - The userpage draft can be submitted while it is in userspace. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't understand the procedure... Isn't the draft in my userspace? Rotterdamned (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Unnecessary request/wrong venue. If you want to move the article into mainspace, just do it. If you want to submit it for AFC review, put {{subst:submit}} at the top. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Thank you very much for the comments! Replaced the redirection with a new text. --Rotterdamned (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I worry that Rotterdamned (talk · contribs) has not met WP:Copying within Wikipedia and is creating copyright violations. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no copyright violation here, the material was written by Rotterdamned in a sandbox and the edit adding it to mainspace was made by Rotterdamned, so the content is correctly attributed to Rotterdamned as required by the licence. You only have to provide additional attribution if you're adding material written by someone else. Hut 8.5 08:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolay Storonsky (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

I am now writing the missing billionaires from the latest Forbes ranking (see my page). Some already have articles about them in non-English versions of Wikipedia. Nik Storonsky (or Nikolay Storonsky - I'm having trouble telling how to spell his name correctly. He seems to have decided to shorten it). The article was also merged with the Revolut article in 2018, since it had no independent relevance. I think it would be right to separate Storonky from the company. But then again, a company does not equal a person. And he is now on the list of the richest people in the UK (7.1B). I prepared a draft (User:Rotterdamned/Nik Storonsky). Rotterdamned (talk) 14:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow review of draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The userpage draft can be submitted while it is in userspace. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Unnecessary request/wrong venue. If you want to move the article into mainspace, just do it. If you want to submit it for AFC review, put {{subst:submit}} at the top. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Okay, I will move Storonsky to the main space. Thank you very much for your help, it's really not all obvious. --Rotterdamned (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  User:Rotterdamned, your wrote “move” but I am not sure you appreciate the important difference between WP:MOVE and copy-pasting. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)User:Rotterdamned[reply]

• There is no problem here, the material was written by Rotterdamned in a sandbox and the edit adding it to mainspace was made by Rotterdamned, so the content is correctly attributed to Rotterdamned as required by the licence. You only have to provide additional attribution if you're adding material written by someone else. Hut 8.5 08:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]