The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 13:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Morse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references mentioned pertain to the hotel, not the person. There is no individual notability to warrant an article. Shecose (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Travel and tourism, Football, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep... I feel that between sources like [1], [2], [3] whats on the article, more online. There is plenty enough for WP:BASIC. Govvy (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  All three links you mentioned are interviews and not secondary sources. Shecose (talk) 18:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I am the article creator. Was phttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tyler_Morse&diff=1215907533&oldid=1213449050 moved from AfC] by an experienced admin and there are plenty of reliable sources showing notability. Nomination is a retaliatory one. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  No valid reasons have been given to support the 'keep' argument. Shecose (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See this. As far as notability, a WP:BEFORE is required which you clearly did not due. See this, this, and this. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is an interview with promotional language. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the other two links. However, the starting of the Times article also appears to be promotional in nature.

Also, stop bringing your unfounded complaints in different places to Afd instead of discussing the article's credibility. Shecose (talk) 05:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Times/BBC etc. sources which show notability. GiantSnowman 19:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per those above. Plenty of newspapers.com hits to peruse. BD2412 T 05:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: See, e.g., Christine Negroni, "Airport hotel aims to bring back a glamor of aviation's golden age", Myrtle Beach Sun-News (February 10, 2018), p. B6. BD2412 T 17:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.