The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boursorama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable company and article seems promo to an extent. Akronowner (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. « Not a notable company ». This is the first French financial technology company, like Revolut in UK : https://www.challenges.fr/entreprise/comment-boursorama-est-devenue-la-banque-en-ligne-preferee-des-francais_18157 ; « Article seems promo ». 95% of the article talk about the History of the company. I am surprised. RutoSu (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're not citing third-party RS coverage here - David Gerard (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Akronowner (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as it stands - RS coverage appears to be lightly-churned press releases (when it isn't a broken link). Appears to be a promotional article, much as it was last time this was deleted. No coverage that meets WP:GNG or WP:NCORP - David Gerard (talk) 11:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would also suggest that, should the article be deleted, the closing admin salt the article name - David Gerard (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV, WP:MILL, and nom. In 2007, "like" could have been excused as a reason for inclusion, but in 2021, everybody knows what Wikipedia does not include. There's a single citation to a reliable source, Le Monde, but that is not significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.