Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 21:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. It won't happen again. Bloodyfist (talk) 19:51, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bloodyfist! I noticed that you recently made an edit at World Blitz Chess Championship and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Restoring a contested edit is never a minor edit. Take it to the article's talk page or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World Blitz Chess Championship. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Bump to disruptive 2. User was previously undone for making the same claim in Magnus Carlsen. Meters (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken it to the talking page, however, I fail to see why this is a controversial edit, and more so, I fail to understand why the shared title is counted as one for each separately. If no one discusses it on the talk page, may I take it as a green light to make the edit? Bloodyfist (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No you may not. You have already been undone more than once, and on more than one article. Clearly there are other editors who do not agree with your edit. As for why I left you a disruptive edit warning, the same thing. You restored a contested edit without discussing it, one that had already been contested on another page, and you even called it a minor edit. Meters (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the edit is controversial, then they should also be willing to discuss it on the talk page. Like you said to me. Bloodyfist (talk) 05:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that the titles should only count as one-half of a title for each is contested. You need consensus to make the edit, otherwise the articles stay as is. That edit has been undone on Magnus Carlsen at least once, and it has been undone on World Blitz Chess Championship at least twice. Similarly, an attempt to claim that there was no winner in 2024 and that both Carlsen and Nepomniachtchi were runners-up was undone, so you know that this is contested. And two editors had already responded to the talk pape thread before you made the above post, so your hypothetical is moot.. Meters (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alright lil bro Bloodyfist (talk) 16:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Meters, you may be blocked from editing. Do not edit other user's posts on my talk page. Don't do that on anyone's page. Meters (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why was it fine for you to completely change my title in the world blitz Championship talk page, yet I couldn't Capitalise the titles in your talk page? Bloodyfist (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained on Talk:World Blitz Chess Championship, I will clarify your header so it is clear what is being discussed, and to make it neutral. This is allowed under WP:SECTIONHEADINGOWN. Your original header "Count The 2024 WBC As Half For Magnus & Nepo" was not clear since readers would have to know what "WBC" meant, what "Nepo" meant, and what the "Half" referred to. It was not neutral since it was a demand to change the article rather than questioning whether the article should be changed. I might not have bothered changing the header if the discussion had involved just that page, but since I was crossposting the issue to the players' articles' talk pages I wanted the topic to be clear and neutral, so I changed it to "Should the shared 2024 World Blitz Chess Championship title count as a half title or a full title each for Magnus Carlsen and Ian Nepomniachtchi?" That way readers of the other talk pages would be informed in a neutral way of exactly what the discussion issue was without having to read the new talk page. See WP:CROSS-POST.

As for what was wrong with you changing the headers on my talk page:

1. It was to a user talk page, not an article talk page.
2. You were not involved in those threads.
3. The threads were old, closed threads. Changing the headers broke any links other users might have had to those threads
4. Your changes were only cosmetic. There was no change to the meaning, clarity, or neutrality of the headers.
5. From a WP:MOS point of view your changes were actually incorrect. Headers are written in sentence case and they were correct as was. It's not really a concern on a talk page header, but there was certainly no justification for changing them to camel case or sentence case. Meters (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Figure Skating at the 2025 Asian Winter Games - Men's Singles. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand. Thanks for telling me. I will find sources to improve the article. Bloodyfist (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]