Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Iwaqarhashmi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National School of Local Administration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 07:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adesolive! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waqar💬 07:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Iwaqarhashmi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National School of Local Administration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 08:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National School of Local Administration. Thanks! Waqar💬 08:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Samuel Moka Lifafa Endeley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I can’t seem to find the work on my draft space and there are not so many references available for the said personality reason why I gave such difficulties. Can you please direct me on how to access this page and review one last time?

thanks. Adesolive (talk) 11:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adesolive. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Chief Dr. Robert Esuka Mbella Lifafa Endeley V., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update but i have no conflict of interest here. This is barely an article about prominent figures in our community. Adesolive (talk) 12:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add honorifics in the articles that you create. The words Chief, Dr., etc. are not required. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Thank you very much Adesolive (talk) 12:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the traditional rulers in these communities are called chiefs, should that honorific still be left out? Adesolive (talk) 12:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, for further clarity, please see MOS:SURNAME. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Adesolive (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you repost Robert Esuka Mbella Lifafa Endeley V for a third time, I will block you. Ignoring advice and deletions is not a good idea. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to François Mbassi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Read more about WP:NPOV, incubate and resubmit the article at Afc. Thank you. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wissy Frank Hoye Yenda Moukoula. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adesolive,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Junior Angabua Chuo Angabua for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-1ctinus📝🗨 13:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Junior Angabua Chuo Angabua, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay

thanks for the feedback. Adesolive (talk) 16:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Catholic University Institute of Buea(CUIB) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Junior Angabua Chuo Angabua has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• It appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://thesunnewspaper.cm/limbe-loses-bitumen-plant-cameroon-maritime-lawyer-junior-angabua-chuo-explains-why/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

• It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Diannaa (talk) 01:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marguerite Aline Abomo Fama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Marguerite Aline Abomo Fama. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of multiple issues. Please, check the maintenance tags on page. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 09:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siantou University Institute (SUI) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abel Ndeh Tadzong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abel Ndeh Tadzong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Prisma James, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:31, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Muriel Blanche. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OKAY THANK YOU

Adesolive (talk) 09:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kang Quintus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 10:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Godwill Neba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:53, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adesolive!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, jolielover♥talk 23:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Basil Nformum Nchana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:41, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ampil was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akwandou Blaise Atarrimah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~🌀 Ampil ^{「💬 / 📝」} 13:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Basil Nformum Nchana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 17:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for promotional sockpuppetry, likely WP:UPE.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• See also Black Lyn and the various creations of Draft:Marguerite Aline Abomo Fama and Draft:Marguerite Aline Abomo Fama/2.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Also Draft:Eystein Young Dingha Junior.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Adesolive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I belong to the Wikimedia user group of Cameroon and we are tasked to create articles based on running programs sponsored by the Wikipedia global foundation, this requires that I write up on any and everyone and with that I have no conflict of interests with any parties concerned. Any reviews that feel like I had any conflicts of interests are purely coincidental. With that, request an unblock so I can continue my tasks and keep working on Wikipedia accordingly. Adesolive (talk) 18:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per discussion below. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adesolive, you are creating many many articles that are being deleted or moved to draft space. None of the accounts editing along side you (same articles, same issues) do not identify themselves as part of any specific project. This includes OlgaEmma (talk · contribs), Osambisusaline (talk · contribs) and Black Lyn (talk · contribs). Is there a coordinator for this project?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is a coordinator for this activity. Unfortunately these deleted items are valuable in our community and have only so much information as we have given and can’t be edited further till further information in made available on the said persons/data written on.User:Adesolive

Who is the coordinator? There is a process for such events that would prevent these issues.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Lexy_Tchuileu That’s her account information Adesolive (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a coordination page for the project itself? -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s the Wikimedians of Cameroon Usergroup Adesolive (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Cameroon_User_Group

That’s information on the group. That’s as much as I have access to. Adesolive (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To confirm, what I'm trying to do is see a coordination page for the project so I can confirm the members and include a link to the project in the unblock message so that the same confusion doesn't happen with another en.wiki admin or checkuser. Please give me a moment to check. Also, could you please communicate to your group that if they will be coordinating with others they should include that information, along with a link to the project, on their user page? I missed it on yours as your image is so large it takes up my entire screen and no one else has done so. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I’d communicate that. Thank you very much. Adesolive (talk) 19:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

all the other accounts too have been added to the user group as requested so please can they be unblocked too? Adesolive (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All unblocked now.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Adesolive (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]