This review is transcluded from Talk:Wally Ladrow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 01:25, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 17:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:09, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

• dying in one month after delete "in"
• captain for the Hillsides team. maybe say "a local team called the Hillsides"?
• the Indian Packing Company which sponsored the team --> the Indian Packing Company, a local meat packing company that sponsored the team
• You could link Drop kick#NFL
• References: all are consistently formatted and appropriate for what is being cited
  • Spot check: 3, 4, 5, 8, 10 all check out

That's all I got BeanieFan11. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @Gonzo fan2007: Addressed everything. BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:20, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]