Hi Niallh26! I noticed your contributions to Ballynoe, County Down and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Warriorglance(talk to me) 04:52, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ballynoe railway station. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 00:24, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What specifically is the wrong edit that I did Niallh26 (talk) 00:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding non-existent files and inline external links. Removing a template for no reason. Using YouTube as a source. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, that is helpful. Can you possibly revert the change back to what I had and I will amend accordingly. Niallh26 (talk) 01:09, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the Ballynoe Stone Circle page recently, so was trying to follow that structure Niallh26 (talk) 01:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will amend the YouTube references now in that page Niallh26 (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many sentences are not backed up by the cited source. And many statements lack citations altogether. There is also a lot of opinions (superficial ones at that) stated like facts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Legamaddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Niallh26! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 14:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Legamaddy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. And welcome. With thanks for your recent contributions, you may wish to consider the following project norms:

• (WP:SEEALSO / WP:EL); If there are external web links, which meet the criteria for inclusion in an article, they should go in an "external links" section. (The "see also" section is for internal links to existing Wikipedia articles - not external websites.)
• (WP:MARKUP); If text or an image needs to be "left aligned", please use the standard Wikitext markup. There is almost never a valid reason (and it is almost never appropriate) to include "raw" HTML code in an article. As you did here.
• (WP:NOTGALLERY); While we have Wikitext markup for including a gallery of images, they should be used relatively infrequently. In almost all cases, the images in an article should be used to support the text (not decorate the article). And should be placed alongside the text they support (not lumped together down the end, far removed from context). Please consider using galleries sparingly. And, perhaps instead, link to the relevant category on Wikimedia commons.

Thanks and best of luck. Guliolopez (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]