Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we introduce a discussion about how to support the creation of a type for time that is compatible with Wikidata, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jodrell Bank Observatory has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Interested, but I'm quite busy at the moment, how long is there to respond? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @Mike Peel: If someone is willing to work on the article, the GAR will remain open. I suggest posting your intentions on the article's GAR page. Z1720 (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mike, TM:Infobox observatory has an issue on NASA Deep Space Network where it duplicates the same logo image twice. When I tried moving the contents of the image param to the logo param, the infobox displayed a filename at the top for some reason. As far as I can tell, as of this diff, the infobox pulls the "logo" image from Wikidata as a second image, a feature that isn't documented in the template documentation. Would it be possible for you to help us figure out how to resolve this duplication/unwanted Wikidata pulling issue? Thank you, Toadspike [Talk] 14:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Toadspike: Thanks for the heads-up. All sorted now, I think. You can suppress the logo from Wikidata using the suppressfields property, like this. There should be only one value for image (P18) on Wikidata, so I've moved the other one. However to cope with other cases, I've also modified the infobox to only fetch the first one. I've also added logo image (P154) to the Infobox documentation. Up to you if you want to change the article to use the image and logo from Wikidata now (just remove the suppressfields and image parameters from the infobox call), or leave it as is. Hope that all helps! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was super fast. Thank you so much for your help! Toadspike [Talk] 14:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]