Archives

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Please help me understand why my latest review has not been accepted by you.

I have been told by administrator/editor Sophisticatedevening that I needed to be careful of having WP:PEACOCK terms. These have been removed.

I have also rewritten the content to ensure that is does not appear "to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia." All I have done is state facts. I am proud of New Zealand achievements and this is one of them. It is not attempting to sell anything. The intention is to educate the Wikipedia readers on the advancement of aerospace technology.

I have done my level best to ensure that it is written from a neutral point of view.

There are plenty of independent, reliable, published sources.

Please reconsider your decision.

TullaMelb (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the second paragraph of the draft. Unfortunately, I stand by the decision to decline the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The producer S. Naga Vamsi is national award winning notable producer, also stop your tactics, you remove all the extensive details i provide in my article, u spoil the article and manipulate it with half edits to make it look like non-notable, and take credit for my edits? i created the article, not you. i know what is notable and what is not. stop your tactics or i will report you to administrator and arbitration committe. in the name of notability you take credit for my work? for my work you take undue credit? for my work? if you have issue with notability discuss in talk page and will add references. stop moving it to draft space without consensus. i am experienced editor, stop ur tactis on me. most importantly stop your non sense and stop wasting my time. i dont know from where editors like you pop up to waste time and energy. stop interfering on this article. stop stop stop. are you threatening me? like you did in the above case. this is serious matter.I know habitual draft space movers such as you who want to take undue credit for others work. Non sense.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 05:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you walked back some of your insults in the edit summary but even still you seem to not be willing to work in a collaborative environment. You are also likely a WP:UPE and your threats to other editors are not taken lightly. Do not come back to this talk page. Should your behavior continue, you will be able to address everything at WP:ANI. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CNMall41,

Thank you for your feedback regarding the draft of the article on Draft:Rahat Mahajan. I acknowledge that I have a close connection to the subject and appreciate the reminder to fully comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID.

To clarify:

• I am personally connected to Rahat Mahajan, which has influenced my contributions. However, I have not been hired, commissioned, or paid by any individual or organization to edit this article. My contributions reflect personal interest in the subject.
• For full transparency, I confirm that Mahamudracollective is the only Wikipedia account I have ever used.

I fully understand the importance of upholding a neutral point of view and ensuring that all content is verifiable and free from promotional language. I am committed to working constructively with the community to improve the article in line with Wikipedia’s policies.

Regarding the image you flagged for copyright concerns, it was originally uploaded by me to IMDb (https://m.imdb.com/title/tt7737704/mediaviewer/rm3540604417/) and is not owned by IMDb. I am the copyright holder and can remove it from IMDb if necessary to resolve this issue. Please advise on the best course of action.

Thank you again for your guidance, and I look forward to collaborating further to improve the article.

Best regards, Mahamudracollective Mahamudracollective (talk) 03:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your changes to Electroimpact. This reference can be used to add more positive points about what they do (https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimvinoski/2018/11/01/what-do-americans-make-aerospace-automation-equipment-at-electroimpact/). Started in riveting and now considered a leader in automated riveting. Also makes jigs, fixtures, molds, carts, and tool bars for airplanes that would not fly without the parts. Chasethebark (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answered at Talk:Electroimpact.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you give me a genuine answer to this, instead of citing subjective essays like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.

Would you nominate articles such as Untitled Steven Spielberg film or Untitled Alejandro G. Iñárritu film for deletion, or are only upcoming Indian film articles subject to deletion? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk2.0:, It honestly does not sound like you want a genuine answer, although I do need clarification of your intent behind the question. It sounds like a veiled accusation of prejudice and/or bigotry. I know we have disagreements with various things in the film-related space, but there are non-accusatory ways to ask questions. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning! Ok, I'm learning, and I appreciate feedback! I thought I did everything perfectly on my first article (I'm a South African based in Johannesburg) writing about Pieter Nel - first South African to do a solo circumnavigation. Literally spent two weeks going for perfection ito notability, neutrality and reliable secondary references (even getting proper permission to submit a photo to Wikimedia) - but then it ended up looking like UPE? I don't know how to disprove that. I feel a bit miffed having done my utmost to create something decent and then ask for feedback in AFC and then get basically banned because it looks too professional? Odin1974 (talk) 13:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Odin1974:, Let us not play games, please. Disclosing your affiliation is simple. Not disclosing your affiliation will lead to SPI reports and likely getting blocked for undisclosed paid editing. There is nothing wrong with having a conflict of interest, it is just wrong when you don't disclose it. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, thanks for the feedback. I also just read Wikipedia:Death of undisclosed paid editing and my draft looks a bit like that - embarrassingly. I copied the style from Robert DeLaurentis (aviator) - also a circumnavigator - and that may not have been the best idea. I'm a pilot in South Africa and I went to the same high school as the guy - but years apart. So I don't know him personally but I was inspired by the story - he also spoke at that school in January. I did email him and get permission to use his photo. Now I'm a bit embarrassed. Can't explain the other deletion though. Thanks for the effort on keeping the integrity of WP. But paid I was definitely not - maybe just too much of a fanboy. (I did read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and didn't think the above was disqualifying though). Sorry. Odin1974 (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Looks like you may be caught in the cycle, maybe lumped in the pool of UPE despite not being paid. I would really love to WP:AGF, but Wikipedia editors such as myself have been beaten up by UPE, and your editing pattern is to a "T" of paid editing that I cannot believe you. Sorry. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ANSER Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]