Hi Qualiesin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Pachycoris.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've linked to the entry on Wikidata, in the process linking to articles in other languages and the Wikimedia Commons category. I've added a reference list and a tag on the talk page, and a taxonbar at the bottom (which linking to Wikidata populates with links). The claim that the taxon was first described in 1843 needs to be sourced, and some information on geographical distribution would be nice.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 21:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hinde Bergner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qualiesin! You created a thread called Please Help at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article about a palm tree species! Hope this goat won't chew it up too much.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapri Sale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sapri Sale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nefesh Mountain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for the great article on Sibú. I'm wondering about the spelling of his name, in this version it says both that the Cabécar spelling is Sibö and Sibú, I left the latter spelling in, but maybe you could check that I didn't remove the right spelling? The article also uses Sibú and Sibö interchangebly, would it be okay to switch them all to Sibú?

If you have any more such well-made articles that have been lingering in draftspace for months, you can of course move them to article-space yourself, you don't have to wait for review. I see that this article was made over 4 months ago, which is of course way too long to wait for a review.

Regards, – Thjarkur (talk) 21:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Russell (American singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sapri Sale, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qualiesin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sapri Sale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 14:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you've reverted the change of Category:Cryptids to Category:Cryptozoology on several articles. The problem with using Category:Cryptid for entities from the folklore record or for supposed sightings of this or that, is that it places the pseudoscientific/fringe term "cryptid" in Wikipedia voice, rather than noting that the entity is of particualr interest to the subculture and pseudoscience—and there are really only a handful of these out there that are of any particular notability to the subculture.

Not long ago, Wikipedia suffered from members of the subculture building a sort of cryptozoology compendoum out of the site, very much in violation of WP:PROFRINGE and WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE. The cleanup of those efforts continues, but there's still a big mess to be mopped up. A major issue is ensuring that these entries are as etic as possible, removing pseudoscience-internal vocabulary unless it's directly relevant and clearly a quote, for example. :bloodofox: (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have previously updated a related article, you might be interested in knowing there is a discussion regarding the Tahquitz (disambiguation) page. The discussion is at Talk:Tahquitz (disambiguation). OvertAnalyzer (talk) 16:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to add that to some other pages. There's also "Category:Japanese LGBT-related television shows" for anime like Adachi and Shimamura, Otherside Picnic, and Cherry Magic! Thirty Years of Virginity Can Make You a Wizard?!. As soon as DeadEndia and S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters begin, then it would make sense to add it to Category:2020s LGBT-related television series. --Historyday01 (talk) 23:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Linguist of Afroasiatic languages" describes what he did much better than "Arabist" (a vague and sometimes derogatory term). AnonMoos (talk) 07:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, he primarily researched Arabic, and occasionally other Semitic languages. "Afroasiatic" is far too broad a category for him. If "Arabist" is too vague a term, take it up with the people who made Category:Linguists of Arabic redirect to Category:Arabists. --Qualiesin (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He published on non-Arabic Semitic languages far more than "occasionally", and was an expert in the historical linguistics of Hebrew. Of course I agree that he didn't study non-Semitic Afroasiatic languages, but "Arabist" is far too narrow to encompass his interests (not to mention faintly redolent of pith-helmeted colonialists romanticizing desert bedouins, something which has extremely little relevance to Joahua Blau's works). AnonMoos (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qualiesin,

Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to pages. See WP:REDNO for details. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cowboy Bebop character redirects to lists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qualiesin, Please don't remove a large portion of content from a page, as you did on the History of LGBT characters in animation: 2020s and describe it as a "typo." Dead Endia has been renamed, Arcane deserves to be on the page, whether you like the series or not, as does Q-Force, despite the fact the latter series is deeply problematic. The Bubble Blabber link should stay as well, its Taneka Stotts not Taneka Scotts, and the stuff about The Ghost and Molly McGee should also stay as well. --Historyday01 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly have no idea how that happened. I was only fixing a typo, I had no intention to delete large chunks of the article. Thanks for catching the error. Qualiesin (talk) 02:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you are in for Judaism? Then you must know the difference: it is Shlimazl who is unlucky. Shlemiel is an inept one, which has nothing to do with luck, but with inability to do things well. Loew Galitz (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree, despite your implication that I don't know my own culture. Qualiesin (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After some thought, it appears you are right: the ineptness of a shlemiel often brings him bad luck. The article must be expanded. I restored the category. Cheers Loew Galitz (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pi Alpha Tau is not the only (Historically) Jewish Sorority, you may want to look at the rest at List_of_Jewish_fraternities_and_sororities#Social_sororities.Naraht (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Template:Rǫgnvaldr-name, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Reinaldo (given name) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 8 § Reinaldo (given name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The Banner talk 19:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

short description must be updated on top of article. see layout. visually it does not change anything, however it plays an important role in search results. your edit, short description is not on top of article. placement info Wikipedia:Short_description#Placement. thank u. <_> jindam, vani (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holawaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holawaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Miri Rubin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was editing the lead section of Passover and I noticed you changed Ḥag hapPesaḥ to Ḥag haPesaḥ in this edit and I'm not sure why since I know very little about Hebrew, though I assume it's not relevant to the change I was making. Please make sure to always put an edit summary — even a sentence or two is better than nothing. To help yourself remember, you may want to turn on "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" in your preferences. Thanks! For comparison, this later edit on the same area of the article has a very helpful edit summary. — W.andrea (talk) 18:14, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qualiesin,

Category redirects are created differently than article redirects. Please look at the code on this page so you know how to create category redirects should you wish to make another one in the future. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering why you made these two (and possibly other similar) edits?: edit to Ty Lee redirect, edit to Mai redirect

I was going to edit those two redirects to link to the specific characters in question (via the anchors installed for each character on that page), until I happened to think to check the edit history first, and was surprised & confused to see your edits undoing what had previously been more specific sections.

To me, it seems obvious that redirects to sections should go to the most specific relevant section possible, as to help readers find the information they are trying to find as quickly & easily as possible, but perhaps there is some MOS guideline or other reason to not do that I am unaware of? (i still have yet to fully read read the MOS as it is very long & tiring)

Since your edit descriptions didn't specify the reason for the change, I have resorted to asking you the rationale behind them so that I might understand better and possibly improve my edits to Wikipedia.

Thanks! Regards, 99.146.242.37 (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ulanji, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 12:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to this discussion Talk:From the river to the sea#Category dispute where you have been pinged. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Valereee (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Qualiesin, I see you're editing again...can I ask you to please go to the ping at Talk:Zionism#Tag on Race and Genetics section and respond? Valereee (talk) 13:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 22 § Mythological foo on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 03:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not appropriate to accuse other editors of "deny[ing] the antisemitism" in an edit summary. That is well into personal attack territory. I hate templating editors that have been here a long time, but you presumably saw the edit summary I left when undoing your addition that there's a discussion ongoing on the talk page. You should consider contributing to that discussion before readding something related to antisemitism - especially since I'm now giving you a manual notice that it's taking place on the talk page. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 01:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I saw you commented on a recent rename discussion of a category Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 3#Category:Quranic scholars

I wish to let you know I have opened a similar rename discussion for a related category , so please take a look if your time allows it to be, for Category:History of Quran scholars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_June_15 Pogenplain (talk) 02:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you.

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Globalize_the_Intifada&diff=prev&oldid=1297422844

Addition of wrong and biased categories plus adding POV easter egg "[Tokenism|the march itself had Jewish students]". Theofunny (talk) 15:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People killed by Hamas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 22:56, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jews from New York City has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the page Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia before you copy information from one page to another as you did with an edit to Acorus calamus . You did not correctly note in your edit summary that you were copying from another Wikipedia page and you also introduced errors by copying out a shortened footnote with parentheses template without the referenced citation from the Works cited list at the bottom of the page Holy anointing oil. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, where should I mention it? The talk page? An invisible comment? Qualiesin (talk) 22:05, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary needs to say "copied from page name. Doug Weller talk 08:06, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on what Doug wrote, in this case it would have been "Text copied from [[Holy anointing oil]]". I also think that it was an excessive amount of detail for a plant article. I'm going to check Plants of the Bible by Moldenke and some other sources to add a shorter section to Acorus calamus. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful/accurate with your edit summaries.

Removing controversial information from the lede of an article isn't simply "cleanup".[1]

- IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a guideline for this? I am asking because I did create a couple of similar "personal" categories. --Altenmann >talk 02:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It just makes no sense for the entire eponymous category to be in all the same categories, when the only relevant page, Arik Einstein, is already in it. If there is a limited number of articles in the larger category, and multiple of them have eponymous categories, then it might make sense to have those as subcategories. But only in the categories most significant to them. Qualiesin (talk) 03:28, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Francesca Albanese shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on a page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cambial — foliar❧ 22:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[2] 1RR violation here @Qualiesin. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 23:02, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also please use edit summaries for significant changes to controversial content. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the reaction by Guterres is a constructive edit. Qualiesin (talk) 00:42, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the issue in question. The issue is that, not only did you introduce issues of MOS:DOUBT into the article, when reverted, you also reinstated your preferred edits, repeatedly removing the descriptions "manipulated" & "fake". That you believe your edits were constructive is immaterial to it being a 1RR violation. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 01:10, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To call the video "fake" is misleading, she did say those actual words. But this discussion doesn't belong here, it belongs on the talk page for the article. Qualiesin (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]