confused about the alleged document section

Why does the CNN source on the current events page say its fabricated/a lie? I'm a bit confused on what exactly this paragraph is about 68.59.47.87 (talk) 05:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contraction in article that should be removed

Under the section heading "Reactions", in the first paragraph, the word "didn't" appears in wiki-voice, that is, not in quotes. MOS:CONTRACTIONS instructs editors to "Avoid contractions, which have little place in formal writing. For example, write do not instead of don't." Therefore, I suggest that this "didn't" in the article be amended to "did not" to comply with policy. Since I can not edit this article myself, someone who can should make this change. Thank you, and have a nice day! 90.139.242.203 (talk) 11:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done. Rainsage (talk) 22:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Analysis Section

The "Analysis" Section is speculation at best, plainly false at worst, and redundant either way. 46.117.189.194 (talk) 15:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No tags for this post.