Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the one person, one vote principle under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows a state's redistricting commission slight variances in drawing of legislative districts provided that the variance does not exceed 10 percent.[1] The Court found that the map, created by a bipartisan commission on the basis of the 2010 census, was constitutional.[2]

See also

References

  1. ^ Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, No. 14-232, 578 U.S. ___ (2016).
  2. ^ Liptak, Adam (April 20, 2016). "Supreme Court Upholds Arizona's Redrawn Legislative Map". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 25, 2023.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harris_v._Arizona_Independent_Redistricting_Commission
No tags for this post.