2,5-Dimethoxy-4-amylamphetamine (DOAM), also known as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-pentylamphetamine, is a lesser-known serotonin receptor agonist and serotonergic psychedelic of the amphetamine and DOx families.[1]

Effects

DOAM was first synthesized by Alexander Shulgin.[1] In his book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines i Have Known And Loved), the minimum dosage is listed as 10 mg orally and the duration is unknown.[1] DOAM was reported to produce a bare threshold and tenseness.[1] In other publications however, DOAM has been said to produce threshold effects at 5 to 10 mg orally and to be hallucinogenic at a dose of 40 mg, with about 10-fold higher potency than mescaline.[2][3][4] In any case, it shows far lower psychedelic potency than other DOx drugs such as DOM.[2][3] No qualitative description of its effects at hallucinogenic doses is available.[3][1]

Pharmacology

DOAM has been found to be a moderate-efficacy partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor.[5] It also shows lower affinity for the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor, whereas it has very low affinity for the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor.[5] The drug is inactive as an agonist of the serotonin 5-HT2B receptor.[5] DOAM shows very low potency as a human trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist.[5] It does not bind to the monoamine transporters.[5]

DOAM fails to substitute for DOM in rodent drug discrimination tests, producing up to 35% responding followed up behavioral disruption at higher doses.[6][7][8] It was also unable to antagonize the DOM stimulus at the assessed doses, and behavioral disruption at higher doses prevented further assessment.[9]

As the 4-alkyl chain length in DOx is increased from shorter homologues such as DOM, DOET and DOPR which are all potent hallucinogens, the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor binding affinity increases, rising to a maximum with DOHx before falling again with even longer chains. Compounds with sufficiently long chains, such as DOAM, or with bulky groups such as DOTB, fail to produce full psychedelic-like effects in animals and/or humans. These findings suggest that such compounds may act as low-efficacy partial agonists or antagonists of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor.[10][7][11][12]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Shulgin A, Shulgin A (September 1991). PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story. Berkeley, California: Transform Press. ISBN 0-9630096-0-5. OCLC 25627628.
  2. ^ a b Braun U, Braun G, Jacob P, Nichols DE, Shulgin AT (1978). "Mescaline analogs: substitutions at the 4-position" (PDF). NIDA Res Monogr (22): 27–37. PMID 101882. TABLE II RELATIVE POSTENCIES IN MAN OF DIMETHOXYPHENYLISOPROPYLAMINE PSYCHOTOMIMETICS WITH VARIOUS SUBSTITUENTS ON THE 4-POSITION [...] Name: DOBU. Potency (total dose mg/man): 10 mg (e). Name: DOTB. Potency (total dose mg/man): >25 mg (d,f). Name: DOAM. Potency (total dose mg/man): 40 mg (e). [...] REFERENCES FOR TABLE II: [...] d. Shulgin, A.T., and Nichols, D.E. In: Stillman, R., and Willette, R. eds. Psychopharmacology of Hallucinogens. New York: Pergamon Press, 1978. e. Shulgin, A.T., and Dyer, D.C. J Med Chem, 18:1201, 1975. f. A > symbol indicates the absence of any activity at the stated dosage.
  3. ^ a b c Shulgin AT (1978). "Psychotomimetic Drugs: Structure-Activity Relationships". In Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds.). Stimulants. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 243–333. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0510-2_6. ISBN 978-1-4757-0512-6. 3.4.11. 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-amylphenylisopropylamine: The last member of this series of homologs is 2,5-dimethoxy-4-amylphenylisopropylamine (77, DOAM). As will be seen below, it has been studied both in behavioral tests and in biochemical systems, and in both it appears to be of substantially reduced potency compared with its two immediately lower homologs. Limited human evaluation has provided the same results. Threshold effects are noticed at levels of 5-10 mg orally, and the compound has a stated effective potency of only 10 times that of mescaline (Shulgin and Dyer, 1975). No qualitative description of its intoxication syndrome at effective levels can be made from the limited experimental data available. [...]
  4. ^ Shulgin AT, Dyer DC (December 1975). "Psychotomimetic phenylisopropylamines. 5. 4-Alkyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamines". J Med Chem. 18 (12): 1201–1204. doi:10.1021/jm00246a006. PMID 1195275.
  5. ^ a b c d e Luethi D, Rudin D, Hoener MC, Liechti ME (2022). "Monoamine Receptor and Transporter Interaction Profiles of 4-Alkyl-Substituted 2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamines" (PDF). The FASEB Journal. 36 (S1). doi:10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2691. ISSN 0892-6638.
  6. ^ Glennon RA, Young R, Rosecrans JA (April 1982). "A comparison of the behavioral effects of DOM homologs". Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 16 (4): 557–559. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(82)90414-2. PMID 7071089.
  7. ^ a b Seggel MR, Yousif MY, Lyon RA, Titeler M, Roth BL, Suba EA, et al. (March 1990). "A structure-affinity study of the binding of 4-substituted analogues of 1-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane at 5-HT2 serotonin receptors". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 33 (3): 1032–6. doi:10.1021/jm00165a023. PMID 2308135. For example, using rats trained to discriminate DOM from saline, ED,, values for stimulus generalization are significantly correlated with 5-HT2 affinity. However, some of the compounds included in the present study (e.g., In and Io) possess a high affinity for the 5-HT2 sites but do not result in stimulus generalization.
  8. ^ Glennon RA (1989). "Stimulus properties of hallucinogenic phenalkylamines and related designer drugs: formulation of structure-activity relationships" (PDF). NIDA Res Monogr. 94: 43–67. PMID 2575229.
  9. ^ Glennon RA, Seggel MR (14 November 1989). "Interaction of Phenylisopropylamines with Central 5-HT2 Receptors: Analysis by Quantitative Structure—Activity Relationships". Probing Bioactive Mechanisms. Vol. 413. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 264–280. doi:10.1021/bk-1989-0413.ch018. ISBN 978-0-8412-1702-7.
  10. ^ Shulgin AT, Dyer DC (December 1975). "Psychotomimetic phenylisopropylamines. 5. 4-Alkyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamines". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 18 (12): 1201–4. doi:10.1021/jm00246a006. PMID 1195275.
  11. ^ Dowd CS, Herrick-Davis K, Egan C, DuPre A, Smith C, Teitler M, et al. (August 2000). "1-[4-(3-Phenylalkyl)phenyl]-2-aminopropanes as 5-HT(2A) partial agonists". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 43 (16): 3074–84. doi:10.1021/jm9906062. PMID 10956215.
  12. ^ Kruegel AC. Phenalkylamines and Methods of Making and Using the Same. Patent WO 2022/192781


No tags for this post.