Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 28

< February 27
March 1 >

February 28

Category:Hercule Poirot (film series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Renaming of the article can be sorted out at WP:RM, and renaming of categories to match articles can be sorted out via WP:CFDS (specifically WP:C2D). HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Scope duplictates existing category: Films based on Hercule Poirot books Northernhenge (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(outdent)
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former commanderies of China in Korea

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I'm not sure; is clarifying "former" needed for this? There are no commanderies of China in Korea rn. seefooddiet (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former election commissions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Defunct election commissions. (non-admin closure) it's lio! | talk | work 06:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not sure if this is the best move, but it matches formatting of other Category:Defunct government agencies by type seefooddiet (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fairfield Stags basketball venues

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT User:Namiba 19:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music videographies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The term videography is being misused in this case as the term is specific to work done by a videographer, and does not mean a list of videos or films (that use is a neologism original to wikipedia which should be edited out as unverifiable). Further, many of the individuals have entertainment credits in work other than video (such as computer games, discographies, acting credits for entertainers who do that as well as music, etc.) on these pages so the cat should reflect that by expanding the scope to all media to reflect the content across the lists. 4meter4 (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When I created this category it was for articles like Michael Jackson videography, which are still named that. I don't think "performances by entertainer in media" is a very helpful, clear, or easy to use term. "Media" is way too broad a term and confusing. At least use something like "on screen" or similar. "Videography" is at least easy for a reader to understand what it is.★Trekker (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Such an undertaking would have been well served being discussed first before wholesale name changes to articles. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Except the term "videography" does not mean a list of videos. Its use in that way is unique to wikipedia and is an unverifiable neologism not supported in sources outside of the encyclopedia. Per WP:NEO, the MJ article needs to be renamed, and the term videography needs to be removed when being used to refer to a video list in all articles across the encyclopedia as that is WP:OR. We can't just make up new definitions to words because it is convenient to do so. Additionally, most of these articles have media credits in a variety of media all on one page (TV, Film, music videos, streaming platforms, radio, computer games, etc.) and in multiple areas of creative contribution in over half of the cases (music performance credits, acting credits, dancing/choreography credits, directing credits, writing credits, producing credits, etc.) 4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok this feels like a subject that maybe needs a broader discussion with several Wikipedia projects and input from many editors.★Trekker (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. This impacts a lot of articles. I think a decision here to change the wording will need to result in a much bigger RfC.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 15:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename, aligning with the article names, but "lists" instead of "list", and maybe drop "by entertainer". If this isn't clear as a category name then the article titles are equally unclear, so better change those to begin with. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • this is a much wider discussion as it also involves articles as well as categories. I'm fine with renaming, but what do we rename it to? Does such a categorization/classification (list of videos) even exist outside of Wikipedia? Perhaps the articles could be renamed to "list of videos by X", but what do we call the category? Video list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3family6 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There's a requested move linked lower down at this page for Madonna videography and similar articles. Also, you didn't sign this comment, like the other one you made in the same edit. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. 1. The term "videography" has been used this way outside of Wikipedia. Here's a Cambridge University Press book: [1]. 2. Moreover, the term had been used before Wikipedia even existed, you can find some examples on Google Books. I've simply searched for "videography" and "discography" being used on one page, here's the results: [2].
If you don't like the term, I would suggest "filmography". But that would require reorganization of some lists, combining music videos and DVDs/BDs with films and TV series and documentaries and such. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Australian artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Up-merge for now. 4meter4 (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would support that.4meter4 (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not small. It contains six items which is enough. The same about other nominated categories. Eurohunter (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 07:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose renaming. 1. The term "videography" has been used this way outside of Wikipedia. Here's a Cambridge University Press book: [3]. 2. Moreover, the term had been used before Wikipedia even existed, you can find some examples on Google Books. I've simply searched for "videography" and "discography" being used on one page, here's the results: [4].
If you don't like the term, I would suggest "filmography". But that would require reorganization of some lists, combining music videos and DVDs/BDs with films and TV series and documentaries and such. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Canadian artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Up-merge for now. 4meter4 (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 07:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of American artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Lists of performances by American artists in media. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category of Category:American filmographies.4meter4 (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not against a rename but oppose the proposed merger. The content of the category have articles recently renamed from "Foo videography" to "List of performances by Foo in media". Then there's the whole scheme Category:Videographies by artist nationality, with each subcat being nominated individually. A consolidated request to rename along the lines of "Lists of performances by American artists in media" might be in order. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds reasonable. I'm not sure how to technically go about doing bundled nominations.4meter4 (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename which categories, to what? A list would be helpful for discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of YouTubers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Lists of YouTube videos. Beland (talk) 02:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged; although I don't think these are technically videographies. 4meter4 (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am fine with a merge as long as we do not leave a redirect and the category is deleted.4meter4 (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Marcocapelle's recommendation to merge. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Greek artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged. 4meter4 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Japanese artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be upmerged. 4meter4 (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 15:00, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Lebanese artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged for now, 4meter4 (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Swedish artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged for now. 4meter4 (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The small-cat nominations in this group should have been bundled.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Puerto Rican artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat; should be up-merged to Category:Videographies for now 4meter4 (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Filipino artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged for now. 4meter4 (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Videography is a technical term for the work done by a videographer. The cats here are not being used in this way; but are trying to turn "videography" into a word that means a list of videos as an original twist on the terms filmography/discography. This is a made up neologism that is far as I can tell is unique to who ever created these cats on wikipedia (there are also a bunch of articles titled with the term, and they should all be renamed). I've never seen "videography" used in this way anywhere else. Note I don't know how to bundle nom the sub cats, but all of these should be deleted. Likewise there are a bunch of article titles using this word that need renaming.4meter4 (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting alongside some of the other discussions which attracted little participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:00, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: At the Category:Music videographies, a point was raised that the issue needs discussion input from relevant WikiProjects, which I will do. Likely all of the nominations should have been bundled as well.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following WikiProjects have been notified: Film, Television, YouTube, Albums, and Songs. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Additionally, an RM has been opened at Talk:Madonna_videography#Requested_move_28_February_2025 about the page moves. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. 1. The term "videography" has been used this way outside of Wikipedia. Here's a Cambridge University Press book: [5]. 2. Moreover, the term had been used before Wikipedia even existed, you can find some examples on Google Books. I've simply searched for "videography" and "discography" being used on one page, here's the results: [6].
If you don't like the term, I would suggest "filmography". But that would require reorganization of some lists, combining music videos and DVDs/BDs with films and TV series and documentaries and such. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Artists by populated place in Cambridgeshire

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Apparently this is a duplicate of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_22#English_artists_by_populated_place, which I closed as merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate levels that are all sparsely populated. Recommended by Marcocapelle (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_20#Category:Artists_by_populated_place_in_England_by_county. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No action - Closing this to allow for a follow-up nomination at editorial discretion, presumably following the discussion below. With that in mind, I'm not removing the existing tags, since they can be changed for the new nomination. (Perhaps someone with automated tools can help with that.) - jc37 22:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: split (or if the split already exists then delete, or if there is no content for either British Overseas Territories or Crown Dependencies then rename), these are two entirely unrelated topics. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons directors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --woodensuperman 15:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nonsensical rationale. Dimadick (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How is it nonsensical? This is exactly what WP:PERFCAT is for. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 16#TV directors by series as precedent. --woodensuperman 15:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons music composers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --woodensuperman 15:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nonsensical rationale. Dimadick (talk) 15:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How is it nonsensical? This is exactly what WP:PERFCAT is for. See this discussion regarding crew. --woodensuperman 15:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:I Can See Your Voice contestants

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Beland (talk) 02:46, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These people are already well known. This is nothing more than a WP:PERFCAT. --woodensuperman 13:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "I can see your voice: Kandidat Marius Bear stürmt die Charts". RTL (in German). Mediengruppe RTL Deutschland. 24 August 2020. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
  2. ^ Lee Adams, William (8 March 2022). "Boys do cry! Marius Bear will sing for Switzerland at Eurovision 2022". Wiwibloggs. After returning home to Switzerland in 2020, Bear attracted a great deal of attention when he appeared on the TV show I Can See Your Voice.
Saisønisse (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arab descent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Small categories. In all these cases, the "nationality descent" categories are already present and are more suitable than "ethnic descent." Note that I did not nominate the general Category:People of Arab descent. Hassan697 (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Short stories set in the Middle Ages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, mostly only 1 or 2 articles per century, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tang dynasty short stories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, for consistency, until the 12th century the tree of short stories by century of setting mostly contains only 1 or 2 articles per century (see discussion above) which is not helpful for navigation. The 8th century is merely an accidental exception. The articles in these categories happen to be all set in China during the Tang dynasty, hence these particular merge targets. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons voice actors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --woodensuperman 10:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nonsensical rationale. Dimadick (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How is it nonsensical? Acting in a series of Warner Brothers Cartoons is absolutely textbook WP:PERFCAT. --woodensuperman 15:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Inverse Phase albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Both entries are redirects to the band. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 09:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Seminole freedmen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:46, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, only one article of which this is not even a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Slavery of Native Americans

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 17#Category:Slavery of Native Americans

Category:Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi alumni

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Recently created 1-article category, categorized to itself. Gjs238 (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deaths by firearm in Norfolk Island

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Deaths by firearm in Australia. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry, also merge with Category:Deaths by firearm in Australia. LibStar (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_28