User talk:Trafford09
| Notes to self |
|---|
| Oh for true democracy in the UK ... Politics_of_the_United_Kingdom#Electoral_systems.
To improve: Christopher Bond (composer) & Ecovision Fantastic vocalist ... not yet on WP! See https://maria-daines.com/ Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL - referenced in 16 articles & here, but lacks its own article. However, see this prototype. Go in Japan; culture; Japanese sports; Asian sports; Chinese; Korean.
AnyUserName (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) |
 Go is played on a grid of black painted lines (usually 19×19). The playing pieces, called "stones", are played on the intersections of the lines. | |
| Players | 2 |
|---|---|
| Setup time | Virtually none |
| Playing time | Casual: 20–90 minutes Tournament: 1–6 hours* |
| Chance | None |
| Age range | Varies depending on manufacturer |
| Skills | Tactics, strategy, observation |
| |
What is Go?
Go (碁), known in Chinese as weiqi (simplified Chinese: 围棋; traditional Chinese: 圍棋; pinyin: wéiqí; Wade-Giles: wei ch'i) and in Korean as baduk (hangul: 바둑), is an ancient board game for two players that is noted for being rich in strategy despite its simple rules.
- A sample unfinished Go game game is shown alongside the Table of contents (TOC) above.
TB
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TB2
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of CLEAPSS for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLEAPSS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.