Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Honor Molloy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Just wanted to let you know that we don't use ibid and the like for citations. If someone throws in a new source, suddenly you're pointing future readers in the wrong direction.

It would be good to check out WP:REFSTART and WP:REFNAME.

Please let me know if I can help. Happy editing! Snowman304|talk 08:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for letting me know! Artist&Architect (talk) 08:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I think I fixed my mistake. Thanks again! Artist&Architect (talk) 08:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Artist&Architect! Your additions to Draft:Honor Molloy have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Diannaa (talk) 11:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Artist&Architect:, hi, recent edits (Twig (film), The Cell Theatre) have shown evidence of copy/pasting. Please refrain from copying sources. Sources should be summarized and referenced. -Bogger (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bogger,

Thank you so much for your time and consideration! I really appreciate your feedback.

I have tried to only use copy/paste language in explicit quotes, but will be more careful in the future! I will also be more mindful about utilizing extensive quotations in my contributions.

I have attempted to address the problems you flagged with The Cell Theatre, please let me know if these revisions are satisfactory.

Best,

Artist&Architect Artist&Architect (talk) 02:36, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty good, I can fix some of the other small bits. On general style, lines like "338 W 23rd St was transformed into an art and performance venue in 2006" and "Established with the vision of creating a '21st-century salon,' the Cell has served as a creative hub in the heart of", and reads like official website, or advertorial content. compare it with: "the building at 338 W 23rd St was converted into art and performance venue in 2006" and "The theatre, intended as a '21st-century salon',^{[citation needed]} serves central" which are more neutral and concise. (Not every venue that considers itself as a "21-st century salon" actually has done the work to be considered so.) Also, by writing more neutral content, you get non-copy/pasted content for free ;) -Bogger (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haha good to know! Thank you again, I really appreciate all of your help.

-Artist&Architect Artist&Architect (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria McDermottroe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saltwater (film), Equus and Joe O'Donnell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gina Costigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Gaiety Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as DomesticMysticism (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is an unreliable WP:USERGENERATED source per WP:IMDB - please don't use it as a source in articles. Waxworker (talk) 13:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My apologies, I was unaware that IMDb was classed as a "user generated" source. Thank you for making the correction.

However, did you have to delete my entire table? I spent a lot of time building that, and you could just as easily have updated the sources, or asked me to do so. Artist&Architect (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect,

Thank you for creating Swansong: Story of Occi Byrne.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You may wish to clean up the bare URLs. It's quite easy. See WP:CITE for details. Otherwise the article is fine.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Swansong: Story of Occi Byrne. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks!  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 10:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Ulysses Project. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY2008 11:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect,

Thank you for creating The Cell Theatre.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please do not copy sources directly. Sources must be summarised, with quotations clearly marked as such.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bogger}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bogger (talk) 13:50, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect,

Thank you for creating Twig (film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please refrain from copy/pasting from sources. Summarise, or quote (sparingly). Quotes could be shortened, they shouldn't be paragraphs. The current quotes make a sizeable fraction of the article's prose

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bogger}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bogger (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Cell Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea, New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Ulysses Project (2022 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Party Face (Boom?).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Catherine Eaton.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bairbre Dowling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Hare.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artist&Architect. Thank you for your work on Brenda Doyle. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Excellent work on your new article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Artist&Architect (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colm Meaney, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sean Walsh and The Silver Tassie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Smarty Girl, Dublin Savage.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Berilla Kerr Foundation. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Newslinger talk 15:36, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Newslinger. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Berilla Kerr Foundation seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 15:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artist&Architect! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Rachel Pickup and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Honor Molloy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Artist&Architect. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Ulysses Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Cassandra Medley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Berilla Kerr Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Smarty Girl, Dublin Savage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Crackskull Row.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as a relatively new editor on Wikipedia, you may want to read Help:Referencing for beginners on how to properly cite your references in an article. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. And you'll continue to get better at it as you learn and gain experience. Happy editing. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:52, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! I'm currently reworking the citations on my other recently created articles for Susan McKeown's discography (that you have also flagged). Happy editing! Artist&Architect (talk) 05:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Artist&Architect. Thank you for your work on Prophecy (Susan McKeown album). Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this page..

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:50, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:The Soul of Christmas.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:53, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for your recent article creations. I noticed at Belong (Susan McKeown album) that you included a four-out-of-five star rating from AllMusic. Please note that the four stars are the user rating, which should not be used in articles. The AllMusic staff rating (which in this case was not assigned) can be found on the left. Cheers! JTtheOG (talk) 01:47, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Oxford International Film Festival Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Berilla Kerr Foundation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:56, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]