David Cameron was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones Date Process Result July 30, 2006 Featured article candidate Not promoted October 3, 2007 Good article nominee Listed October 14, 2015 Good article reassessment Delisted May 19, 2016 Good article nominee Not listed December 22, 2016 Featured article candidate Not promoted March 2, 2025 Good article nominee Not listed News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on May 11, 2010, September 17, 2012, September 18, 2012, September 19, 2012, and June 24, 2016. Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 11, 2014, May 11, 2018, and May 11, 2020. Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance). Politics of the United Kingdom Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Berkshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berkshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Berkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerkshireWikipedia:WikiProject BerkshireTemplate:WikiProject BerkshireBerkshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. 2010s This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s

There are multiple serious reports about the fact that his family profitted from the money given to slave owners in about 1833. Money which the british taxpayer had to give until 2015. Why is it not a topic here? Would his family been able to make him go to elitists private schools without the money? Tims wondering ... 90.160.109.62 (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add information on the deal that cameron failed to gain as it had an effect on public opinion with a seperate sub title on camerons bad deal. The ultimate decision to leave is seemingly due to the failure of Camerons government to reach an agreement that would’ve presented the Britain and EU partnership in a favourable light. Cameron entered the deal with optimism calling for greater power to block EU legislation, a reduction in EU migrant benefits and steps to prevent eurozone bailouts which was promising for the public. However, when the final deal emerged the EU had hardly moved their position, probably believing the UK would not vote to leave and that they did not need to offer any more negotiation. There was clear compromise by the UK on all sectors but especially on the issue of immigration in which Cameron failed to gain any change to sending benefits abroad or the issue of illegal working and got no reduction in the European aspect of free movement. This is portrayed by many as a missed opportunity^[1] due to the perceived advantages the remain campaign would’ve grasped if they had secured a better deal before the referendum. At the time of Camerons bad deal, 78% of the British public supported remaining in the EU ^[2] but due to the lack of any significant reform, support for staying within this system fell away. The initial goal of Brexit was arguably to allow citizens to decide on Camerons deal with the EU on the “country’s terms of EU management”^[3]. It begs the question of if a better deal had been secured initially, would Britain still be a player in the European Union? Libbyyyskye (talk) 12:43, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Day Creature (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]