This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Psychology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Neuroscience Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative views High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'd like to point out that this article doesn't make any real distinction between forms of meditation and the research that has been done on them.Sparaig2 (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps a more widely accessible -- since Wikipedia is about open access -- source for more information from "meta-analysis of 21 neuroimaging studies" by Fox et al might be: http://www.christofflab.ca/pdfs/Fox2014-ContemplativeBrain.pdf in addition -- not instead of -- the cited publication. So that have-nots too may/can read this very important and useful report.Kdarwish1 (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike with other articles, when I click “edit” ok this article I can only edit the intro paragraph, I can’t see or edit the other sections of the article. Anybody know why? Jukhamil (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The pages currently looks editable in the normal way to me. Klbrain (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources that I thought could be helpful for this article that I found while I was doing research. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/31/14/5540.full https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911007531 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/acta-neuropsychiatrica/article/abs/meditation-mindfulness-and-mindemptiness/CDA506C3D0FBB58C5B2407CB982CC6A9 Cfarmer4 (talk) 21:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Cfarmer4[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2025 and 9 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gabrielladec (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Logan Aug.

— Assignment last updated by Logan Aug (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]